Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

heatsinks, heatsinks.....
heatsinks, heatsinks.....
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th June 2005, 08:19 AM   #1
bigpanda is offline bigpanda  Hong Kong
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: HKSAR
Default heatsinks, heatsinks.....

Attached is drawing of 2 heatsinks. The total fin length in A is (h/s+1)*l while in B is (l/s+1)*h. The difference will be l-h. But I believe that B is a better dissipater because of the convection of hot air... right?

I had a set up as in B, the width of the circuit board and thus the bracket is about 170mm. I had two piece of 165mm (l) x 100mm (h) side by side and bolted to the bracket. I had about 80mm running off the board on either side. After I use it for some time (I didn't remember for how long). I found that the 2 heatsink was only heated up in the centre where they are in contact with the bracket. The temp. on either ends are just a bit over ambient. If I am trying to get better dissipation, I would have to go for 'taller' h rather than 'longer ' l ?

If I am using a bracket that is wider than 170mm, do you think it would do better?. (But the O/Ps are still concentrated within the 170mm ie, width of the circuit board.)

I don't know what might happen if I am using a A setup. Would the heat be still concentrating in the middle section. Since the fins are running horizontally, I guess that won't happen. So which one is a better dissipater? Can somebody shed some light on this?

I am now blowing it with a 8cm fan, just to play safe.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2005, 08:21 AM   #2
bigpanda is offline bigpanda  Hong Kong
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: HKSAR
Oops, forget the attachment
Attached Files
File Type: pdf heat_comp.pdf (7.3 KB, 93 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2005, 08:54 AM   #3
jan.didden is offline jan.didden  Europe
diyAudio Member
jan.didden's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The great city of Turnhout, BE
All other things equal, the vertical arrangement will have more flow and more dissipation for same temp rise.

Jan Didden
Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket - George Orwell
Get more Linear Audio for less! Check out my Autoranger and SilentSwitcher
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2005, 09:40 AM   #4
Chris Jennings is offline Chris Jennings  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southampton

The conduction of heat away from the contact point is related to the thickness of the back of the heatsink, not the fin arrangement, the thermal efficiency of the fins is highest with them vertical.

To aid the spread of heat, a 6mm plate of aluminium (the same size as the two heatsinks) could be screwed between the backs of the heatsinks and the bracket, this will spread the heat more evenly to the fins.

Remember to use heatsink compound.

Your local metal merchant may well have small offcuts of plate that they will let you have cheap.

  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2005, 09:42 AM   #5
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
what thickness is your heatsink?
To work efficiently you need the heat to dissipate from the whole surface area and this requires that the main sink is roughly the same temperature across the whole back surface.
The thickness to width ratio to achieve this is normally in the range 5 to 12. Assuming 10 then your sink needs to be about 8.5mm thick (85mm from centre to edge).

B layout with the fins vertical is much better. A will have a heat dissipation capacity about 64% of B (80% due to horizontal fins and 80% due to long fins) These percentages are just guesstimates but you can measure this in situ.

A blown sink usually has close fin spacing of 2mm to 3 mm.
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote


heatsinks, heatsinks.....Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To-3 Heatsinks sandstorm33 Swap Meet 8 6th February 2008 05:33 PM
about heatsinks bigpanda Solid State 2 4th May 2005 04:34 PM
Heatsinks DD_Davo Chip Amps 2 13th April 2005 02:00 PM
Heatsinks Peter Daniel Swap Meet 19 4th February 2004 12:08 AM
Heatsinks for DoZ ultrachrome Solid State 0 4th February 2003 10:23 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio