|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
|
Ok, Vishay-Draloric is kind enough to provide non-linearity and current noise specs for their resistors.
The SMM0204 - MS1 parts are Mini-Melf (i.e. cylindrical SMD) metal film parts with a rating of 0.25 W. Non-linearity A3 for a 10 k part is 110 dB. I do not remember the exact definition, but I believe it is resistance change per volt and hence should read -110 dB. Current noise for 10 k is 0.05 µV/V. The D...-CRCW series (available down to 0.5% tolerance) are rectangular metal glaze SMD parts. A 10 k 1206 (also rated at 0.25W) has a nonlinearity of 65 dB, a 0402 will only have 50 dB. Current noise is 0.1 µV/V for the 1206 package and 0.5 µV/V for the 0402. So we can safely conclude that metal glaze, whatever its composition, is sonically inferior and should be avoided as feedback and filter resistors. Eric |
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
|
Quote:
This is exactly the sort of jumping to conclusions that makes reasonable people laugh at audio maniacs. Decisions/beliefs are presented as if they are based on science/engineering, but with very little scratching at the surface it becomes apparent how shallow the reasoning really is. MR |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
MRehorst, I think you need to work on your reading comprehension before you flame. tiroth only concluded that metal glaze SMD resistors have more noise and worse thermal emf than thin film SMD resistors.
So chill the you-know-what out. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
|
Right you are! I missed that one. I apologize to anyone who thought that I was flaming anyone. I was merely disagreeing.
I stand by my assertion that those numbers rule out the use of any of those parts for specific audio applications. MR |
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Land of Morning Calm??
|
Quote:
Panasonic also makes PPS smd caps, and digikey sells them. And something quite interesting is "acrylic resin" film smd cap (ECPU series) made by the same company. (Digikey has them too.) They say something like "it sounds very good." Check out the URL: http://www.maco.panasonic.co.jp/eccd/index.html |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas,Texas
|
Tempo and Voltage Coefficient seem to be two of the most often quoted specs for high precision resistors. Since the power dissapated in a resistor will very with signal swing, a dynamically changing temperatures are varying the value of the resistance with signal ie. a nonlinearity. A simular argument can be made for
chance in resistance with voltage due to Voltage Coefficient. Data for two of the more highly regarded resistors for audio are at: http://www.caddock.com/Online_catalo...Lit/TypeTF.pdf http://www.vishay.com/document/63001/63001.pdf Further complicating this are thermal conductivity and thermal mass of the resistive film, substate, and encapsalating material. Several zealots are using "naked" Vishays without the encapsulation. Perhaps the thermal characteristics are better without the thermal insulation. There has also been trend in using oversized resistors by some manfactures. Differences in thermal mass perhaps? I believe there are many engineering parameters that could cause resistors to sound different. The datasheets above will give a bench mark for good numbers for Tempco and Voltage Coefficients for the spec readers. H.H. Also for more background: http://www.riedon.com/handbook_default.htm http://www.riedon.com/app_notes.htm http://www.metechinc.com/solutions/voltage.html |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas,Texas
|
The panasonic polyproplene sound good. I have no experience with the PPS caps.
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
My bad Harry. Could have sworn it was you who recommended ECH-S, but it must have been another forumite.
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas,Texas
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sonoma, California
|
For my prototyping, and I do a lot of it, I stay away from thru-hole parts. SMD have very low inductance, to allow high bandwidth amps etc...Sure, they're small and difficilt to handle for many. Here's a definite solution to their handling:
http://www.t-rexelectronics.com/
__________________
Koolkid |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Surface mount components! | ungie | Swap Meet | 12 | 25th September 2009 01:41 PM |
| Surface mount components for analogue audio... Yes or no??? | Pilbromatic | Parts | 26 | 6th August 2009 04:59 AM |
| Surface mount drive components? | ak_47_boy | Class D | 3 | 10th June 2008 06:53 AM |
| Soldering Surface Mount Components | Ulas | Digital Source | 2 | 14th April 2006 02:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |