Full wave vs full wave bridge rectifier - diyAudio
 Full wave vs full wave bridge rectifier
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 11th January 2005, 02:40 AM #1 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Melbourne Full wave vs full wave bridge rectifier Do these two rectifier circuits have any real difference between them regarding the charging characteristics of the following capacitor? The standard formulae for calculating their output voltages and currents shows the FWB to be around 20% more efficient in terms of the transformer VA rating required to produce a fixed output VA. How does this manifest itself in the way the first filter capacitor is charged?
 11th January 2005, 04:22 AM #2 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Milwaukee, WI They are electrically identical. FWB has two diode drops at any given time, so produces somewhat greater loss. Nowhere near 20% though (unless you are using tubes for the bridge ). Tim __________________ Seven Transistor Labs, LLC Projects and Resources / Electronic Design and Consultation
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
Quote:
 Originally posted by Sch3mat1c They are electrically identical. FWB has two diode drops at any given time, so produces somewhat greater loss. Nowhere near 20% though (unless you are using tubes for the bridge ).
That they are electrically identical makes sense to me in some respects, but read on.

Here is what I meant by efficiency difference of 20%:

Assume you require 24VDC at 1A.

Without taking diode drops into account, the textbook formulae say that you need the following transformer ratings:

FWB:
Vac = 24 Vdc / 1.41 = 17 Vac
Iac = 1 Adc / 0.62 = 1.6 Aac
VA rating = 27VA

FW:
Vac = 24Vdc / .71 = 34 Vac
Iac = 1 Adc / 1 = 1 Aac
VA rating = 34VA

So what gives?

 11th January 2005, 05:10 AM #4 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Austin The bridge uses all of the secondary all of the time Full wave uses half of the secondary all of the time Bridge gives you higher voltage out Full wave gives you lower voltage out AFAIK, The extra kick from "all" of the secondary is where you get the lower VA rating. __________________ Jesus loves you.
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
Quote:
 Originally posted by Stocker AFAIK, The extra kick from "all" of the secondary is where you get the lower VA rating.
But why not 50% less VA rating instead of only 20% less?

I'd always assumed (without really thinking about it) the derating applied to the current capability of the transformer in the FWB arrangement had something to do with capacitor charging currents. I'm not sure I ever read this; I inferred it from the formulae.

 11th January 2005, 07:25 AM #6 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Scottish Borders Hi, surely the formulae are not comparable? 34Vac rectified & smoothed will give about 50Vdc less 1 diode drop. Did you mean 2 times 17Vac? then you have 1 diode drop off 25V but in the bridge two diode drops off, so effectively about 2.8% less efficient. The heating effect in the transformer secondary and to an extent the primary as well is based on the accumulation of Isqrd*R losses over the full charging cycle (integral but I don't know the maths). Non-sinusoidal pulses with a high peak to average ratio will have a much higher heating effect averaged over the full cycle. This leads to the derating shown in your first formula for but for an unknown reason is missing from the second. All rectifier / capacitor charging systems will suffer from this derating, not just the bridge. regards Andrew T.
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
 Originally posted by jeff mai But why not 50% less VA rating instead of only 20% less? I'd always assumed (without really thinking about it) the derating applied to the current capability of the transformer in the FWB arrangement had something to do with capacitor charging currents. I'm not sure I ever read this; I inferred it from the formulae.
I'll guess your question is not so easy to answer. The main difference between a center tapped transformer and two diodes and a fullwave bridge is I*I*R looses in the transformer together with losses in the core together with chosen caps. I think, not knowing for sure, that 20% seems to be a good approximation. This is a gut feeling only.

The VA rating is determined by the inner temperature of the core and the windings, don't forget that.

May I ask why you ask? Are you thinking of using a center tapped transformer?

I see that you have cross posted this question to "the other forum" . Noboby there knows? Fred or Jocko maybe?
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
Quote:
 Originally posted by AndrewT 34Vac rectified & smoothed will give about 50Vdc less 1 diode drop. Did you mean 2 times 17Vac
You might read my post more carefully. If I had meant 17Vac to make 24Vdc instead of 34Vac to make 24Vdc, I would be comparing two identical setups which makes no sense.

In a full wave rectifier (not a bridge) one must have double the AC voltage (center-tapped, of course) to make the same DC voltage. That is clear. I've been using full wave rectifier circuits with valves for years. I'm curious why the calculated current rating of the transformer is different from what is expected.

The formulae I used are published in practically every transformer manufacturer's literature as an aid to selection.

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
Quote:
 Originally posted by peranders May I ask why you ask? Are you thinking of using a center tapped transformer?
Thank you P-A!!!

I was afraid that no one would ever understand what I was getting at.

This thought was inspired by the discussion of capacitor charge currents in the "Snubberized" thread on the chip amp forum. There I suggested choke input power supply filters and full wave rectifiers as a means of reducing peak charge currents.

Later I was reflecting on my suggestion regarding the full wave rectifier and was wondering why I thought this would reduce the peak charge current. I realized it was because of the mathematical relationship within these formulae and not because of any mechanism of which I'm aware.

So now, of course, I "have to know" if you understand what I mean.

I suppose it could be due to resistive and core losses, though 20% seems like a lot to me. Anyone else have any info?

 11th January 2005, 08:50 AM #10 Electrons are yellow and more is better! diyAudio Member     Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Göteborg, Sweden Blog Entries: 4 If the transformer is big enough this isn't a big issue really because you won't drive the transformer hotter than h**l. One thing you might consider is not to have too much capacitance, "lagom"(*) as we say in sweden. My gut feeling says that a dual secondary transformer with two recitifier bridges is the best but I'll guess someone can confirm that. *) not too little, not too much, just about enough. Is there a good single word for that in english? __________________ /Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me PA03 LM4780 amplifier group buy, SIGN UP HERE for the group buy 0 boards left. 118 paid.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post hilbert_mostert Tubes / Valves 4 28th April 2009 08:26 PM dscrobe Tubes / Valves 6 1st July 2008 07:35 PM goskers Solid State 2 5th November 2004 02:30 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:26 PM.