|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hawaii
|
That is:
(I doubt it but...) Is there a (perceived) consensus as to which of these is best. For let's say power supply of a headphone amp, for instance. More to the point: What are folks opinions based on experience? I wonder because Panasonics are available from DigiKey but seem to have a more 'mundane' reputation, whereas Muse and Cerafine seem to have a more hi-end 'boutique' reputation. Even though Muse cost around the same as Panasonic. Cerafine seem to be around 3 or 4 times a$ much, but still not stratospheric. Thanks! Peace, Sanaka
__________________
We are sorry for the inconvenience.... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: sg
|
i`m a fan of the P FCs.. they are quite good in most aspects. i`ve put them in digital power supplies with good results too.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bulgaria
|
Black Gate Standard is another (better) option. The price is the same as Cerafine's but they sound better I think.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SINGAPORE
|
Quote:
as in u have tried all 3 of them and done a comparison and derive at the outcome that the Panasonics beats the rest? what kind of digital supply u used them in? would appreciate more details of your findings in terms of differences in sonic qualities or any measurements taken that justify for your conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SINGAPORE
|
Quote:
no way that the BGs cost the same as Cerafine! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
FCs are better than Cerafines. A lot of us think that they aren't so hot.
Don't like any of the "Kahn Brothers" caps either, although there may be a few decent ones. I usually rip any of those brands out, and replace with a Panasonic, as much as I cringe giving them money. Black Gates for the same price???? No way................. Jocko |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hawaii
|
How abhout the Panasonic FM's?
They're new in the latest Digikey catalog. Pana. seems to be touting them as an up-classed FC: 50% higher ripple current, 40-70% lower impedance, longer life, and lower price. Catch? Peace, Sanaka
__________________
We are sorry for the inconvenience.... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
The catch seems to be that they don't come in as many different size/value combos as FCs do.
Jocko |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto
|
Are you using a regulated power supply?
Alvaius |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: sg
|
FCs are great as long as they are for solid state.... since there is no FC equivilant for high voltage, sometime you`ve got to use cerafines...
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Pana FC small caps | cartman | Swap Meet | 0 | 15th November 2008 01:16 PM |
| will Bruce work with my Pana 8 TS? | freddi | Full Range | 0 | 26th July 2007 10:02 PM |
| WTB-WTT Pana FC 220uF 50 or 63V | Andypairo | Swap Meet | 0 | 2nd October 2006 07:18 PM |
| For Sale: Cerafine, Muse, Os-Con, Stealth Diodes and much more | KevinLee | Swap Meet | 16 | 14th November 2005 05:58 PM |
| Elna Silmic vs. Pana FC for digital supplies? | dorkus | Parts | 0 | 7th December 2002 09:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11449 seconds (76.61% PHP - 23.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |