|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
Hi all,
I'm going to use some of these ring terminals http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=095-666 at the speaker end of my speaker wires. I have a Paladin 8000 crimper, but the only die I have is for crimping coax. Looking at the table that came with the crimper, I see two that seem to fit the bill, but I suspect one of them is the wrong one. They are: P/N 2031 for 22-10 AWG non-insulated terminals and lugs P/N 2095 for 22-10 AWG insulated terminals and lugs These lugs appear to be insulated, but I don't know whether one is meant to slide the insulator off, crimp as a non-insulated lug, then slide the insulator back on, or if one is meant to crimp with the insulator in place. I suspect the former is true, but I wanted to run it by someone who may have used these or similar terminals before. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
Sorry to be talking to myself here. But just in case anybody else ever ends up in the same boat, those PartsExpress ring terminals are really the non-insulated type. You slide the insulating cover off the lug and onto the wire, crimp the lug the same as you would a non-insulated lug. Then you just slide the insulating boot back over onto the lug. I ended up getting the Paladin P/N 2031 die for non-insulated terminals and it's the correct one.
I'm using VMPS speakers, and they have binding posts that are too shallow to use normal banana plugs with. The banana plugs will wobble and make a lousy connection. But the large hex nut of the binding post can be completely unscrewed, allowing the use of the ring terminals (0.25" hole diameter). They work just great and cost next to nothing. And the Paladin tool and die does a great job crimping them. I am a happy camper now! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Västerås
|
Hope i do not intrude too much but i read the title as:
Which palladin died to crimp these ring terminals. Sounded like a very noble quest to me
__________________
Hjelm |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
|
Sounds like the work of a "suicide crimper"
What appendage do you suppose he inserted into the crimper to cause this? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Solder vs crimp? | smithy666 | Equipment & Tools | 57 | 10th January 2010 07:55 PM |
| Xcelite Ergocrimp vs. Paladin CrimpALL | sthayashi | Parts | 1 | 17th August 2005 01:25 AM |
| about the shorted ring (flux stabilizer ring) | haggy | Multi-Way | 3 | 4th January 2002 02:04 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07429 seconds (78.07% PHP - 21.93% MySQL) with 10 queries |