|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Croatia
|
How do I figure out which values of resistors to use in a balanced stereo step attenuator. One friend gave me two very nice ITT 4-pole switches, and I'm planning to use it for my Aleph P 1.7 project.
I found few scripts on the internet that are calculating ladder type configuration for unbalanced mode. But I would like to use both, balanced and unbalaced. So I need 8 decks. Can I use same value of resistors for both + and - balanced, as I use for unbalanced? So, lets say I want 39dB attenuation. For unbalanced ladder I have to use 99878 ohms for the input (Rx) and 708 ohms for the ground (Ry). Can I use same value of resistors for input of + and - balanced and just use the same ground resistor? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
If you want to do it balanced, you can use just 3 resistors: 2 resistors from the two source phases, and at the end one resistor connecting them. The ends of this resistor goes to the two inputs. This last resistor is the one you switch. You really need only a single switch deck for it.
Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Croatia
|
What do you mean I need only single switch deck for it? I tought I need one deck for +, one for -, one for unbalanced in and one for ground (for one channel). Am I getting it all wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Why don't you draw it the way I put it in my previous post? That will maker it immediately clear.
Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern Va.
|
Check out figure 2 of this page:
Balanced attenuator Such an arrangement with a fixed input resistor may give problems in a passive preamp because of the variable output resistance, so best to use short cable to power amp. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes that's what I meant.
Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Croatia
|
Quote:
Is it possible to have absolute zero volume with this? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Yes. Zero ohms between the legs. Come on, you don't need ME to tell you that! Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vancouver
|
Note that doing this kind of balanced volume control changes the calculation for the resistances you need to get a given attenuation.
Here's a standard dB step sequence as used in the Goldpoint controls. http://www.goldpt.com/taper.gif Here's my calculation, with disclaimer that I haven't doublechecked it: Let each series resistor be S ohms and shunt resistors be H ohms. Output voltage is input voltage times H/(H+2*S). In dB, attenuation A=20*log_10(H/(H+2*S)). Solving for H, for a given attenuation the shunt resistor H=(-2*S*10^(A/20))/(10^(A/20)-1), where '^' indicates exponentiation. If there are any other resistances in series or parallel with this circuit they need to be considered in the calculation. To get 0 dB H is infinite, i.e. no resistor; a short of 0 ohms for H will not completely eliminate sound because it's unlikely the non-inverted and inverted lines are exactly identical. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Croatia
|
Thanks for your comments guys. I'm starting to understand it. But I want to make it for balanced and unbalanced mode. Can I just use this schematics for my attenuator? Left side for the unbalanced, + and - balanced, and right side for the ground as it says on the pic.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Goldpoint. new, 10K, 24 step stereo attenuator | franjy | Swap Meet | 2 | Yesterday 05:30 AM |
| 24 step ladder att - question | sparkle | Solid State | 8 | 14th January 2009 02:02 PM |
| FS: new 10k ladder type VRs | jrsun | Swap Meet | 24 | 18th December 2007 03:55 PM |
| FS: 10k Goldpoint Mini-V (Series-type) Stereo Attenuator | Strohmie | Swap Meet | 3 | 19th October 2005 10:39 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10757 seconds (79.37% PHP - 20.63% MySQL) with 11 queries |