|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Athens Greece
|
I tried to change the volume pot on my fathers Kenwood amplifier (dated early 1980's) with a new pot. I bought a new 100K logarithmic pot with the same value as the old one. When I tried to install the new pot I found out that the old pot had four legs for each chanel and not 3. So the old pot had a total of 8 pins while the new pot had a total of 6 pins.
I intalled the new pot but it played to loud. Does anyone know why the old pot had 4 legs/ch? Where can I get these pots today? I will try to post some pictures tommorow. Thanks George |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
These pots were quite common on old stereo amps, and were quite often associated with a "loudness" switch, which gave a bit extra bass/teble boost when activated. The extra connection is a tap on the main resistive element (can't remember now around what %, but not half-way), which with associated circuitry, gave reduced loudness boost as the volume was turned up.
This idea has dropped out of favour, and I don't think you will get this type of pot anymore - unless you happen to find surplus stock or genuine spare part. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Athens Greece
|
You are correct! If anyone knows where I can get a pot like this I would be much obliged.
George |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sunnyvale, CA.
|
The "boutique" stereo pots like the Noble and Alps have the loudness taps on them. They are somewhat pricey and the physical size is a bit large too. If that is not a concern, then you can get that... Try here:
Michael Percy Audio. Look at his PDF catalog. HTH. -Ti |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wayne, West Virginia
|
Quote:
Most Kenwoods from the 70's and 80's used a dual 100k (B) linear taper pot with a 40% loudness tap. Radio Shack may still sell an Alps dual 100k (A) audio taper (log) w/40% loudnes tap. Make sure you get the right taper! 100k A = log or audio taper 100k B = linear taper Wayne |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Athens Greece
|
Thank you,
I will try to post a picture so that someone can tell me what type of taper I have, log or linear? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midland, Michigan
|
Almost all audio level control pots are "audio taper" log.
There are a few exceptions.
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
I agree with FB regarding passive volume controls.
But active volume controls (control is in the feedback loop) and active loudness controls complicate matters considerably. So to modify FB's statement - nearly all passive controls are logarithmic / audio taper, nearly all active controls are linear. So you do need to make sure you get the right taper, but if you know whether the control is active or passive you can presume the type of taper required. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wayne, West Virginia
|
In my experience most SS amps/recievers that used a passive form of loudness circuit used a linear pot. With a cap and resistor from the tap to ground with a switch across the cap (I'm ignoring the treble boost, most good loudness circuits do). In that configuration the linear pot behaves close to a log taper. Using a 100k log taper would make it difficult to get sufficient bass "boost" without using low resistor and high cap values and the resulting loss.
It's very easy to tell what you have as I stated earlier. If it says this: 100KB it's a linear pot, 100KA it's a log/audio taper. As I have owned 6 Kenwood sand amps, a couple recievers and repaired quite a few of them (I mod'ed a KA 5700 last month, the loudness circuit in particular!), so if you post the model number I might be able to tell you what you need. Cheers Wayne |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
A bought a couple of very inexpensive 4-leg pot at Radio Shack a week or so ago. ~$2.00 The pot had the word "ALPS" stamped on it.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| which ferrite beads for mos legs? | richwalters | Power Supplies | 4 | 28th June 2011 08:48 PM |
| Volume control on DVD player remote. Lose resolution at low volume? | Circlotron | Digital Source | 2 | 10th June 2011 07:20 PM |
| three legs caps and other questions.. | kyrochan | Solid State | 7 | 19th June 2006 01:35 PM |
| Beads on FET legs | argonrepublic | Parts | 2 | 17th January 2006 10:52 PM |
| fake Alps with 4 legs - how to connect it | Stabist | Parts | 6 | 13th January 2005 10:41 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10940 seconds (79.23% PHP - 20.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |