|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi everyone,
I searched, of course, but found slightly contradictory ideas regarding the different types of low-value capacitors. Anyway, I've been upgrading parts in my cd player for a while (Marantz CD63ki), and have just bought 50 300pf silver mica caps through Ebay, at a fairly good price. I am thinking of using these to replace all existing ceramic caps in my player, most of which are in digital areas I think. Is this a safe thing to do sonically, or are there any circuits/uses where this substitution might actually degrade performance? If noone replies I will do it anyway, and report my listening observations, but I might do other things too, I usually make several changes at once. Thanks!
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
|
Probably not a really smart idea, especially for bypassing
digital power supplies. 300pF is not large enough value for digital bypassing. This is not to say you shouldn't/couldn't improve performance by redoing the digital bypassing. But 300pF micas aint the way.
__________________
bel |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
For bypassing, i.e. establishing a low impedance HF path from power rail to ground I've generally thought that ceramic (usually .001uF to .1uF) is the best choice do the very high bandwidth. A silver mica of similar value is huge in comparrison and expensive as well. Even if SM's were available and practical it wouls seem like a waste to me. A good place for silver micas is where you need a very low value (<1000pF) wideband cap in the signal path or feedback path.
To me bypassing calls more for a blunt instrument than a rapier. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg MB Canada
|
Hello,
I have use silver mica's in the feedback loop of the op-amps and around the op-amps in my CD63 with good success. I also have had good success by using polystyrene caps in the same places. Trial and error is everything. Thanks KevinLee
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks for the replies everyone!
I won't do it then, save them for something else instead. Perhaps I will buy better ceramics and use those at some point. KevinLee, What positions are these please, can you remember?
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Retiree
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
|
" Blanket' replacing ceramic caps with silver mica, sensible?"
Either sounds like would be heavy, uncomfortable, and not very warm. Have you considered wool? It's been done to death I know, but it gives the sheep something to do. Whoops! ....... I reread your post and see that I have perhaps missed your intentions. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
If you are looking for improvement by replacing caps, I would suggest you start by trying to figure out where the output cap is. Increasing the value (unless it is already ok) has the potential to lower noise and extending the base response.
As an aside, I recall a 70's era reciever that claimed as a feature that it had an "integral rumble filter". What this meant was that they had stuck an itty-bitty 2uF cap in in the input. Each of the inputs, not just the phono. Now there's creative marketing. Making a "feature" out of a cost saving. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I've also changed many PSU caps, resistors, some diodes, the output op-amps, added shielding, reclocked, built supply for the clock, added damping, changed feet, etc. So I am down to a few little things now I think, hehe.
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg MB Canada
|
Hello SimontY,
Here are the locations in my CD63 where I installed silver mica caps: -CD21, CD22, CD23, CD24 -C602, C602, C603, C604 -C605, C606 -C607, C608 I am going to assume you removed QN05, QN06, QN07 and QN07, If you have not you should. Removing these muting transistors is a great mod in the CD63/67 players. Also try installing a .01uf ceramic from input (pin 2) to ground (pin 16) on the (3) TCA0372 chips. Good luck KevinLee
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks Kev, I'll look at doing those replacements. I did remove the muting transistors, altho I can't remember it making a very big difference to the sound.
I will try some caps on the chips too, great! Thanks
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| silver mica caps | doktor | Parts | 14 | 26th April 2006 02:08 AM |
| silver mica and pp caps | ronardi | Parts | 3 | 24th March 2005 03:06 PM |
| Replacing ceramic disc caps with silver mica caps? | G | Solid State | 5 | 18th November 2002 02:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11573 seconds (76.60% PHP - 23.40% MySQL) with 11 queries |