Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th March 2004, 09:12 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Default Same-type BJTs w. different Vce -- what differs?

There are many BJTs that come in different Vce ratings but seem
otherwise to be the same eg. BD135/137/139, BC546/547.
Except for the Vce rating, there usually seems to be no other
differences and prices differ only marginally or not at all. A higher
Vce should imply a different doping of the BC junction so one
could expect other parameters to be affected. While most
datasheets, like for those BJTs above, are often rudimentary, I
did managed to find some japanese BJTs with more detailed
datasheets and that come in different Vce ratings. Even though
further info like Cob and fT was specified, there was no hint at
any differences apart from the Vce rating.

If nothing else differes and prices are the same, why have
different models? There's got to be a catch somewhere.
Is there any reason to prefer high or low Vce over the opposite
when the low Vce version is sufficient??
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 11:02 AM   #2
Netlist is offline Netlist  Belgium
diyAudio Moderator
 
Netlist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Christer,
good question.
I guess it might have something to do with production costs. Also, the price we pay when buying a small amount of devices is totally different from what big companies pay for large amounts.
Looking at the BD135-series spice parameters, as an example, the values are all the same for the higher Vce rated BJT’s which confirm your findings with the datasheets.
When buying transistors for repairing electronics I usually select the one with the highest Vce.
One fits all is the keyword.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 11:14 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Yes, probably prices differ much more in large quantities, but the
question then still remains, are there any differences, or do the
manufacturers just test the decvices and label them according to
manufacturing variations? If so it might explain why they would
charge more for higher Vce devices. It still doesn't make much
sense for retailers to stock all versions if they anyway charge
almost the same price for all types. It should be cheaper for
them then to stock just the highest rated type.

Also, supposing it is just about manufacturing variations in
breakdown voltage, wouldn't this still have implications also
for other parameters?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 11:52 AM   #4
Netlist is offline Netlist  Belgium
diyAudio Moderator
 
Netlist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Again, taking the BD-series as example, the datasheet reveals a difference in max Hfe between 135 and 137/139 serie.
Looking at the BC556-series, a difference in noise figure is noticed.
Take a look at the 2N5550 and 2N5551. Basic parameters only show a difference in Vce.
The datasheet however list other minor variations between them.
So, in critical design environments these small changes other the Vce will probably be taken into account.
All datasheets I compared were from Fairchild.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 11:54 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Hugo,

it seems you have found more detailed datasheets than I have
managed. Which brands were you looking at? I checked the
datasheets for at least three or four brands for the BD135/137/139.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 12:34 PM   #6
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
As far as I'm aware high beta type transistors have low Vce.

So I'd guess typical hfe for the higher voltages is lower.

sreten.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2004, 12:45 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally posted by sreten
As far as I'm aware high beta type transistors have low Vce.

So I'd guess typical hfe for the higher voltages is lower.

sreten.
Yes, I thought too that might be one reasonable consequence,
but one would think the datasheets should make a note on that
difference.

Hm, actually when rechecking the datasheets for BC546/547
I now note there is no A version of 547 and no C version of 546,
and for the unqualified versions the hfe ranges are different. Still,
there is both 546B and 547B, both with the same hfe range, and
I have not found any other difference between 546 and 547 than
the voltage rating.

Maybe it is reasonable to assume that lower-Vce devices have
higher hfe in general?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2004, 10:23 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
I have been thinking some more about this and looked in my
semi. physics book and it still puzzles me.

It seem not at all clear that there should be any relationship
between hfe and breakdown voltage. My book does actually
give a relationship between Vcbo and Vceo which depends on
hfe but it is rather brief and unclear about this. Further, I think
all datasheets I have seen usually have a simple relationship
where Vcbo is a few volts higher than Vceo, typically 5V, which
goes against that hfe should be involved, at least to any
degree worth bothering about.

Vcbo depends on the doping concentration in the collector only
as far as I understand, with the exception of some transistors
where there is an effect called punch-through, which seem more
of an exception than a rule.

Hfe, on the other hand, does not depend on the collector doping
at all, but only on the dopings of the base and the emitter and
the base width. There seems to be no relationship at all between
Vcbo and hfe, as far as I can see.

Remains the case with punch-trhough then. This is said to occur
in transistors with low base doping and a small base width,
and causes a breakdown to occur for other reasons and at a
lower voltage than in the usual case. In this case there could
be a relationship since the base width is involved also in the
breakdown voltage. However, this seems not to be applicable
to most BJTs.

One might also speculate about the manufacturing tolerances
in doping concentrations etc. and whether this may have some
effect. It is difficult to control the exacat doping concentrations
and also the base width, I suppose. However, althought this
causes some interdependence it seems not obvious it should
lead to any relationship between hfe and Vcbo except when
punch-through is involved.


Surely there must be some people who know the answer???
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2004, 02:46 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
It is strange, people often consider me to be too theoretical, but
when I occasionally ask very simple and practical questions, nobody
seem to have an answer.

Let me rephrase my original question then:

Suppose you have the choice of two BJTs which are described
in the same datasheet and the only piece of information that
differs between them in the datasheet (apart from the parts
number) is the max. rating for Vce adn Vcb. Also suppose the
Vce rating of both these devices is more than sufficient for
your purpose and that the price is the same. Which of these
two devices do you buy and why?


Let's also assume this is for a new design and that we are not
considering that any left-over devices may be more useful for
future projects if the are higher rated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2004, 03:37 PM   #10
jcarr is offline jcarr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Christer:

In my own experience, BJTs that are identical on the data sheet other than the maximum Vce are likely to show some statistical differences if you actually sit down and measure them in large quantities (hundreds or more).

From what I have seen, the tendency is to get more high-hFe devices from the lower Vce BJT. From memory, the capacitance and ft also statistically come out a little better with the lower Vce BJT.

hth, jonathan carr
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BJTs for VAS Stages danville Solid State 33 2nd July 2008 08:28 AM
Replacement surround differs from original... Will it work? harmonic Multi-Way 0 16th November 2006 04:55 AM
how a solid state amplifier differs from a subwoofer amp araven Solid State 3 24th October 2006 09:13 PM
TC11 specs differs from measured data! Please confirm! sobazz Multi-Way 9 26th February 2004 05:59 PM
Toshiba JFETs BJTs Sanken BJTs Praise! Swap Meet 5 14th February 2004 06:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 PM.

Page generated in 0.11698 seconds (80.66% PHP - 19.34% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio