|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
There are many BJTs that come in different Vce ratings but seem
otherwise to be the same eg. BD135/137/139, BC546/547. Except for the Vce rating, there usually seems to be no other differences and prices differ only marginally or not at all. A higher Vce should imply a different doping of the BC junction so one could expect other parameters to be affected. While most datasheets, like for those BJTs above, are often rudimentary, I did managed to find some japanese BJTs with more detailed datasheets and that come in different Vce ratings. Even though further info like Cob and fT was specified, there was no hint at any differences apart from the Vce rating. If nothing else differes and prices are the same, why have different models? There's got to be a catch somewhere. Is there any reason to prefer high or low Vce over the opposite when the low Vce version is sufficient?? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Christer,
good question. I guess it might have something to do with production costs. Also, the price we pay when buying a small amount of devices is totally different from what big companies pay for large amounts. Looking at the BD135-series spice parameters, as an example, the values are all the same for the higher Vce rated BJT’s which confirm your findings with the datasheets. When buying transistors for repairing electronics I usually select the one with the highest Vce. One fits all is the keyword. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Yes, probably prices differ much more in large quantities, but the
question then still remains, are there any differences, or do the manufacturers just test the decvices and label them according to manufacturing variations? If so it might explain why they would charge more for higher Vce devices. It still doesn't make much sense for retailers to stock all versions if they anyway charge almost the same price for all types. It should be cheaper for them then to stock just the highest rated type. Also, supposing it is just about manufacturing variations in breakdown voltage, wouldn't this still have implications also for other parameters? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
|
Again, taking the BD-series as example, the datasheet reveals a difference in max Hfe between 135 and 137/139 serie.
Looking at the BC556-series, a difference in noise figure is noticed. Take a look at the 2N5550 and 2N5551. Basic parameters only show a difference in Vce. The datasheet however list other minor variations between them. So, in critical design environments these small changes other the Vce will probably be taken into account. All datasheets I compared were from Fairchild. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Hugo,
it seems you have found more detailed datasheets than I have managed. Which brands were you looking at? I checked the datasheets for at least three or four brands for the BD135/137/139. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
As far as I'm aware high beta type transistors have low Vce.
So I'd guess typical hfe for the higher voltages is lower. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
but one would think the datasheets should make a note on that difference. Hm, actually when rechecking the datasheets for BC546/547 I now note there is no A version of 547 and no C version of 546, and for the unqualified versions the hfe ranges are different. Still, there is both 546B and 547B, both with the same hfe range, and I have not found any other difference between 546 and 547 than the voltage rating. Maybe it is reasonable to assume that lower-Vce devices have higher hfe in general? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
I have been thinking some more about this and looked in my
semi. physics book and it still puzzles me. It seem not at all clear that there should be any relationship between hfe and breakdown voltage. My book does actually give a relationship between Vcbo and Vceo which depends on hfe but it is rather brief and unclear about this. Further, I think all datasheets I have seen usually have a simple relationship where Vcbo is a few volts higher than Vceo, typically 5V, which goes against that hfe should be involved, at least to any degree worth bothering about. Vcbo depends on the doping concentration in the collector only as far as I understand, with the exception of some transistors where there is an effect called punch-through, which seem more of an exception than a rule. Hfe, on the other hand, does not depend on the collector doping at all, but only on the dopings of the base and the emitter and the base width. There seems to be no relationship at all between Vcbo and hfe, as far as I can see. Remains the case with punch-trhough then. This is said to occur in transistors with low base doping and a small base width, and causes a breakdown to occur for other reasons and at a lower voltage than in the usual case. In this case there could be a relationship since the base width is involved also in the breakdown voltage. However, this seems not to be applicable to most BJTs. One might also speculate about the manufacturing tolerances in doping concentrations etc. and whether this may have some effect. It is difficult to control the exacat doping concentrations and also the base width, I suppose. However, althought this causes some interdependence it seems not obvious it should lead to any relationship between hfe and Vcbo except when punch-through is involved. Surely there must be some people who know the answer??? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
It is strange, people often consider me to be too theoretical, but
when I occasionally ask very simple and practical questions, nobody seem to have an answer. Let me rephrase my original question then: Suppose you have the choice of two BJTs which are described in the same datasheet and the only piece of information that differs between them in the datasheet (apart from the parts number) is the max. rating for Vce adn Vcb. Also suppose the Vce rating of both these devices is more than sufficient for your purpose and that the price is the same. Which of these two devices do you buy and why? Let's also assume this is for a new design and that we are not considering that any left-over devices may be more useful for future projects if the are higher rated. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
|
Christer:
In my own experience, BJTs that are identical on the data sheet other than the maximum Vce are likely to show some statistical differences if you actually sit down and measure them in large quantities (hundreds or more). From what I have seen, the tendency is to get more high-hFe devices from the lower Vce BJT. From memory, the capacitance and ft also statistically come out a little better with the lower Vce BJT. hth, jonathan carr
__________________
http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/, http://www.lyraaudio.com |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BJTs for VAS Stages | danville | Solid State | 33 | 2nd July 2008 08:28 AM |
| Replacement surround differs from original... Will it work? | harmonic | Multi-Way | 0 | 16th November 2006 04:55 AM |
| how a solid state amplifier differs from a subwoofer amp | araven | Solid State | 3 | 24th October 2006 09:13 PM |
| TC11 specs differs from measured data! Please confirm! | sobazz | Multi-Way | 9 | 26th February 2004 05:59 PM |
| Toshiba JFETs BJTs Sanken BJTs | Praise! | Swap Meet | 5 | 14th February 2004 06:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11698 seconds (80.66% PHP - 19.34% MySQL) with 10 queries |