|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon, USA
|
I replaced the OPA2134s in my active line level crossover with LM6172s. The power supply is regulated +/- 12V, I have caps from the opamp power pins to ground (don't remember the value right now, they're small). For some bizarre reason (probably because I read the multimeter wrong), I had 16Kohm series resistors at the outputs of the opamps (and I wondered why the dynamics seemed softer ever since I added the XO). Anyway, with the 16K resistors, the LM6172s worked fine. I opened it up to replace the series resistors with some 50 ohm Vishay/Dales that I bought for that purpose. That made the opamps starts squealing, and the scope shows it's oscillating. It also seems to be radiating a lot of noise, because moving my hand around changes things, and using an alligator clip lead to short the input RCA just made things worse, probably because it turned into an antenna - the scope showed oscillations at the input pins too. I tried adding bigger caps to the power uspply pins, but no luck. The circuit is on a breadboard right now, it's not on a PCB. The opamps are directly on the breadboard, no sockets. The decoupling caps have their leads cut down so they're flush with the board, not standing up on their legs.
Any ideas? Do I just need more series resistance? More/better/different decoupling? I'd bought a bunch of opamps to try, and I have some AD826s in there now, and they don't squeal (there does seem to be a bit more of low-level buzz though). I'd rather use the AD826 with 50 ohm resistors than the LM6172 if it's going to need a series resistor in the thousands of ohms. What's a maximum for the amount of series resistance I can try? I liked the sound of the LM6172 in the circuit, but I really don't think using it with 16K resistors is what I want to do. Another thing I noticed is that these make an audible thump when I change volume levels on my transformer volume control (probably teh collapsing field, my switch is break-before-make). The OPA2134 didn't do that... or maybe the 16K resistors swallowed it. Thanks in advance for any help. Saurav |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
Try adding a small capacitor in parallel with the feedback resistor. This will add a pole at 1/(2*pi*R*C) where R is the feedback resistor of course. Try making the pole around 10 * 20 kHz, and if it stabilizes things, work up from there if you want to push it even higher out of the audio band.
You could also try adding a small cap between the two input pins of the opamp, which should help to remove RF. You can also add a cap from the signal input to ground (bypassing Rin, your input resistance) to help with RF. Finally, 50 ohms may not be sufficient to decouple the opamp from a very higher capacitive cable attached to its output. Try 100 or higher. The thump may indicate a DC offset at the output. Once you stablize things, check for that. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon, USA
|
Wow, lots of good tips. Thanks.
Quote:
Quote:
I'll try out your other suggestions too. Thanks once again. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ontario
|
Check out Jan Meier's reply on Headwize.com for hints:
http://headwize2.powerpill.org/ubb/s...2&srch=lm6171; As well as his implementation of the LM6171 in one of his projects: http://headwize2.powerpill.org/proje...=meier_prj.htm |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon, USA
|
Excellent, thanks a lot. Now I have lots of ideas to try.
After looking at the schematic, I have some questions. Here's the schematic I'm working from (the high-pass section is what I'm dealing with here, I left the OPA2134s in the low pass section since I'm not too concerned with that): ![]() Differences - mine are single opamp stage and therefore 2nd order. I got lazy and ran out of space and opamps; I should try 4th order some day. Anyway... the output and -ve input are tied together, and the feedback resistor goes to the +ve input. This worked fine with the OPA2134s, but doesn't work with the LM6172s. I'm not sure I can just add the feedback network + resistor ground on the -ve input that I see in Jan Meier's schematic? That doesn't sound right. So... I can add the input RF cap, change the input series resistor, and move the feedback tap to after the output series resistor. I'd appreciate it if someone could tell me what exactly to do with the inverting input. Thanks, Saurav |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
OK, I'll be a nice guy and not wonder why you're asking for trouble by using 100MHz opamps...
There's a bunch of stuff on this topic in the National Semi app notes. Or see the chapter on opamps in Bob Pease's "Troubleshooting Analog Circuits." He shows a nifty method of tailoring noise gain while keeping unity signal gain by attaching a series RC (or just a resistor) between the inverting and noninverting input. There's also a lot of good stuff at the National Semi site on decoupling the output to better stabilize with capacitive loads. And get Pease's book. You'll be very happy when you go to 4th order and use a Butterworth-squared (Linkwitz-Reilly). Makes crossover integration much easier.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon, USA
|
Quote:
Thanks for the references. I did look at the schematics/appnotes in the datasheet for this opamp. I'll go study their website more thoroughly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
National's app notes have made many a fine evening's read. That's where I learned the basics of thermal design, noise theory, and feedback in solid state circuits. I'd give you some links for your specific app, but doing the search and multiple window thing with a 28.8 modem is a bear. Where's Phred when you need him?
Oh, one more thing: breadboards. BAD for stability, especially in the megahertz range,
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon, USA
|
I figured there was a reason why all commercial products weren't built on breadboards
I found one app note about building high frequency filters, and found some schematics that look exactly like what I'm trying to do. The biggest difference I see is that mine connects the output to the -ve input, while these have an Rf between output and -ve, and an Rg between -ve and ground. If I understand this right, these two would set the overall gain in the regular way, while the Rs and Cs on the +ve input would make the whole thing a filter. If I have that right, my questions are: * Even though the datasheet says this opamp is unity gain stable, would it be happier if I gave it a modest gain factor of 2 or 3? * I guess I should use resistors in the few kohms to build this voltage divider/gain setter network? How critical is the quality of the resistors here? * Given that I use a passive linestage and a 2A3 SET amplifier, would it be sacrilege to use these preamps to add a little gain to my system and improve the overall gain structure for the old LPs with low recorded levels? Thanks for the help. Saurav |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It may well take a properly designed, groundplaned circuit board to tame that opamp. A perfboard won't have as much stray coupling as a breadboard, but it may still not be good enough.
You can retain your topology by some noise gain tricks. What you'll do is put a resistor in series with the input lead to the noninverting input, then run an RC series combo from the output (tied to the inverting input) back to the junction of the series resistor and the noninverting input. The values I recall, which made sense for a 6dB noise gain, were 10K for the input resistor and something like 5K for the noise gain shaping resistor. Its series cap doesn't have to be too large, maybe .01uF or so. If your layout allows, this can stabilize things. You might also think about an LR parallel network in series with the output (like a power amp). I'll see if I can dig up the app note number or a link to the RC trick. I first read about it in a Pease paper maybe 20 years ago, so I'm sure there's an official App Note.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Lm6172 Dip | AR_sound | Swap Meet | 0 | 19th October 2006 02:05 AM |
| Wtb: Lm6172 & 6171 | pablosapiens | Swap Meet | 2 | 22nd January 2006 05:21 PM |
| LM6172 sound | jesper | Solid State | 1 | 24th December 2005 04:17 PM |
| Modify LM6172 for 12V | justpoor | Digital Source | 5 | 11th September 2005 05:30 PM |
| lm6172 class a bias? | crippledchicken | Parts | 0 | 3rd September 2004 04:33 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13685 seconds (83.25% PHP - 16.75% MySQL) with 10 queries |