A Titmus said:Ok, I apologise for asking this very basic question, but I haven't found a simple answer anywhere.
...
Once again, I am sorry if this is a rediculous question.
Andrew
And some 40 posts later the discussion is still going on and
no definitive answer as to what causes the effect has been
agreed upon. That is how elementary and ridiculous the
question was.
As some earlier poster said, there is no need to apologize
or assume a question is ridiculous. Some of the seemingly
most stupid and elementary questions (where I would not
include your question) are actually not trivial at all, but rather
so elementary that almost nobody has bothered to think
about them.
SY is this a personal insult? I can't tell....
"that's why I wasn't surprised that you couldn't find the right answer."
It's responses like this that make me so eager to get in the middle of nonsense like this. Why try to discuss anything just to argue with idiots with a chip on their shoulder. Why try and educate someone who has no desire to learn anything. maybe I should just Email answers to people with questions to avoid having to deal with moronic post like this.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/forwir.html#c1
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/wirfor.html#c1
"that's why I wasn't surprised that you couldn't find the right answer."
It's responses like this that make me so eager to get in the middle of nonsense like this. Why try to discuss anything just to argue with idiots with a chip on their shoulder. Why try and educate someone who has no desire to learn anything. maybe I should just Email answers to people with questions to avoid having to deal with moronic post like this.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/forwir.html#c1
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/wirfor.html#c1
Re: SY is this a personal insult? I can't tell....
my thoughts exactly when I was replying to your posts.
Who said different minds don't think the same?
Fred Dieckmann said:[BWhy try to discuss anything just to argue with idiots with a chip on their shoulder. Why try and educate someone who has no desire to learn anything. [/B]
my thoughts exactly when I was replying to your posts.
Who said different minds don't think the same?
A Titmus said:Ok, I apologise for asking this very basic question, but I haven't found a simple answer anywhere.
...
Once again, I am sorry if this is a rediculous question.
Andrew
Seems like this guy here was also hearing things: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=86978#post86978
All the same
Just for fun, I took the lid off of my amp and drove it with a highish input signal and no load. The input signal was just audible from the MOSFETS with my ear up close. Without a load it is not particularly loud. The only interesting thing is that I replaced two of the transistors a couple of months ago. All four of them are producing the noise.
I did get someone else to listen to it as well, they found it difficult to identify the tune (tinny, high and very quiet), but it was there. I wouldn't expect it to replace my speakers!
I would also like to thank everyone for their opinions so far, I never dreamt that this would attract so much attention.
Andrew
Just for fun, I took the lid off of my amp and drove it with a highish input signal and no load. The input signal was just audible from the MOSFETS with my ear up close. Without a load it is not particularly loud. The only interesting thing is that I replaced two of the transistors a couple of months ago. All four of them are producing the noise.
I did get someone else to listen to it as well, they found it difficult to identify the tune (tinny, high and very quiet), but it was there. I wouldn't expect it to replace my speakers!
I would also like to thank everyone for their opinions so far, I never dreamt that this would attract so much attention.
Andrew
Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
I wasn't aware of your deeper. philosophical side.
millwood said:
the world's mathematians are still trying to prove 1+1? I bet you that most of us have no idea what that means.
I wasn't aware of your deeper. philosophical side.
Re: Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
Russell and Whitehead showed that, indeed, this is a deep philosophical issue. It's amplified a bit in Courant's "World of Mathematics."
Remember the line in Videodrome: "They have something much more dangerous than that. They have a philosophy."
Peter Daniel said:
I wasn't aware of your deeper. philosophical side.
Russell and Whitehead showed that, indeed, this is a deep philosophical issue. It's amplified a bit in Courant's "World of Mathematics."
Remember the line in Videodrome: "They have something much more dangerous than that. They have a philosophy."
Re: Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
not terribly surprised. awareness is an acquired taste and not everyone is gifted to have it, as you have proven it personally.
Peter Daniel said:
I wasn't aware of your deeper. philosophical side.
not terribly surprised. awareness is an acquired taste and not everyone is gifted to have it, as you have proven it personally.
Re: Re: Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
This is my first post I'm reporting to moderators.millwood said:
not terribly surprised. awareness is an acquired taste and not everyone is gifted to have it, as you have proven it personally.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
what are you reporting it for?
your having no awareness? well, you said that yourself.
Peter Daniel said:
This is my first post I'm reporting to moderators.
what are you reporting it for?
your having no awareness? well, you said that yourself.
Re: Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
I am not so sure there was anything philosphical in there,
unless millwood made a typo. You cannot prove whether
"1+1" since this is not a statement. You can calculate it,
but you cannot prove it. Perhaps he meant
proving whether "1+1 = 2", which is or isn't true depending
on our choice of algebraic system. For the usual algebraic
system it is elementary and follows from the Peano axioms.
Peter Daniel said:
I wasn't aware of your deeper. philosophical side.
I am not so sure there was anything philosphical in there,
unless millwood made a typo. You cannot prove whether
"1+1" since this is not a statement. You can calculate it,
but you cannot prove it. Perhaps he meant
proving whether "1+1 = 2", which is or isn't true depending
on our choice of algebraic system. For the usual algebraic
system it is elementary and follows from the Peano axioms.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
Are you reporting it to yourself?
Peter Daniel said:
This is my first post I'm reporting to moderators.
Are you reporting it to yourself?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
I'm looking for a third party opinion, as I don't believe what I see.
Christer said:
Are you reporting it to yourself?
I'm looking for a third party opinion, as I don't believe what I see.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What !!!!!!!
Yes, I didn't mean there was something wrong with it. You
report it as a member, not as a moderator, to the moderators.
I just thought is sounded a bit fun that a moderator reports
to the moderators, but it's late and I'm tired, so it probably
wasn't as funny as I thought.
Peter Daniel said:
I'm looking for a third party opinion, as I don't believe what I see.
Yes, I didn't mean there was something wrong with it. You
report it as a member, not as a moderator, to the moderators.
I just thought is sounded a bit fun that a moderator reports
to the moderators, but it's late and I'm tired, so it probably
wasn't as funny as I thought.
Re: I'm as cool as I get.
How recently?
Christer, it IS funny, at least to a third party.
Fred Dieckmann said:Which particular guys did you have in mind..............
How recently?
Christer, it IS funny, at least to a third party.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Design & Build
- Parts
- Singing MOSFETS (basic question)