Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th April 2012, 05:26 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
KatieandDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
As an absolute test then YES go down the Wheatstone Bridge route.

As a purely functional test go down the reforming route and do a simple test with a resistor.

All electrolytics will dry out in time. HOW LONG is anyones guess.

Try reforming them by applying 75% of their rated voltage through a limiting resistor.

Leave them at rated voltage for several hours.

Then discharge them through a known resistor and measure how long it takes them to discharge.

It takes approximately 0.7xRxC seconds to discharge a good cap to 75% of its charge.

THIS IS NOT EXACT but it is a reasonable test to see if they are OK or completely useless.

I forgot to mention, if the voltage across the cap never reaches the applied voltage then it is equally useless. (Care must be taken that the charging resistor isn't too large in value as the leakage current may exceed the charging current and the cap will never charge).

The best solution is to look at the datasheet and find out what the leakage current should be. If you don't know then it is a bit of guesswork. Charging at 100mA should achieve the desired results.

Last edited by KatieandDad; 20th April 2012 at 05:34 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2012, 03:23 AM   #12
kp93300 is offline kp93300  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by john65b View Post
Can't you could put another smaller known capacitance cap less than 20,000uf in series and re-measure total capacitance with your LC Meter??

1/Ct=1/C1 + 1/C2

EDIT - It's been a while, and I think I got that right.
What a brilliant idea!
This is lateral thinking that i am lacking !
Thanks to john65b.

Hi KatieandDad
I try reforming the caps with 16 V dc power supply via a 1K in series. Initially , the V across the 1k is about 16 V and slowly drops as charging continues.
After 15 minutes, it is still charging and i shall aim for 100ma charging current .
thanks

kp93300
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2012, 09:14 AM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
KatieandDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
0.7 x 60000 x 10e-6 x 1000 = 42 seconds.

If you are still charging after 15mins then you have a lot of leakage.

You will not get the full 16V across the cap. but you should get close and the voltage across the resistor should drop to reflectthe leakage current.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2012, 10:32 AM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
KatieandDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
If they haven't dried out they may recover after reforming - don't give up just yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2012, 06:53 PM   #15
DDB is offline DDB  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fly over country
Default Conrad's Large Cap Bridge

For those interested in Conrad's cap bridge, here is some additional info for a version I recently completed. The bridge worked very well at the 60hz frequency Conrad designed it for, but I wanted to try it at the 120 hz specified by most data sheets. This however compressed the DF readout and as I couldn't find a log taper 250 ohm pot, Conrad suggested a 25 ohm pot be substituted which was calibrated to give a .1 DF max reading. An additional switch in the top right corner was added to sequentially add 13.263 ohm resistors for an additional .1 DF per step. A total DF range now is 1.2 at very good resolution on the low end where needed. Since I also have a GR1656 bridge which measures caps to 1100u, this bridge is used for large values.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Outside.jpg (89.2 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg inside2.jpg (118.2 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpg Shop.jpg (147.4 KB, 64 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2012, 12:41 AM   #16
kp93300 is offline kp93300  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Just a word of thanks who post in this thread.
The cap is ok and is a great SQ improvement in my DOZ class A amp power supply filter.
Bass is effortless !

kp93300
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dayton foil vs PPS cap listening test sendler Parts 8 1st March 2013 06:38 AM
Polar electro with bypass cap to replace nonpolar as coupling cap? at77 Parts 0 12th January 2010 02:05 AM
My little coupling-cap-test in a UL-70W-Amp Blitz Tubes / Valves 6 11th July 2009 04:55 PM
Tripath Coupling Bypass Cap Test Bed Query Davet Class D 4 9th January 2008 02:12 AM
Is there any test cd to test jitter using a scope ? gaetan8888 Digital Source 4 10th August 2007 09:24 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 27.27%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio