Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th August 2011, 01:57 AM   #1
Lavcat is offline Lavcat  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Lavcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey USA
Default panel mounting RCA phono jacks

I am looking for an RCA phono jack that is of good quality with the following characteristics:

1.) Both shield and hot insulated from chassis.

2.) Solder lugs for both shield and hot connections.

3.) Relatively easy to mount in a single hole.


So far I am considering Cardas or WBT 210. I am open to other suggestions.

My question is what size mounting hole is required? I have looked at the mechanical drawings for both Cardas and WBT 210. Unfortunately the drawings do not impart as much information to me as I would like. I have read that Cardas mounts in a 3/8 inch hole and WBT in a 12 mm hole. Can someone confirm if this is correct? Are these round holes or D shaped holes? If the WBT 210 were mounted in a 1/2 inch hole would it be too loose?

Thanks for any help.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 03:52 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
If you don't mind saving a lot of money buying things that lack high price elitist names, these are very high quality and perform quite well:
untitled "Gold Plated RCA Jacks B Red & Black" - about 1/2 way down the page. Mount in a round hole, about 3/8" if I remember correctly.
Mike

Last edited by Michael Bean; 13th August 2011 at 03:56 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 04:13 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Bean View Post
If you don't mind saving a lot of money buying things that lack high price elitist names, these are very high quality and perform quite well:
untitled "Gold Plated RCA Jacks B Red & Black" - about 1/2 way down the page. Mount in a round hole, about 3/8" if I remember correctly.
Mike
I agree that those are perfectly suitable for all but the most uptight audiophools..... I mean audiophiles.

I've bought these similar jacks and have been perfectly happy with them.....

2 pairs Female Amplifier RCA Jack Chassis Sockets USA | eBay
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 07:34 AM   #4
Lavcat is offline Lavcat  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Lavcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Bean View Post
If you don't mind saving a lot of money buying things that lack high price elitist names, these are very high quality and perform quite well:
untitled "Gold Plated RCA Jacks B Red & Black" - about 1/2 way down the page. Mount in a round hole, about 3/8" if I remember correctly.
Mike
A 1/2 inch hole would be easer for me because it can be punched. Thank you for the suggestion though, the price point is well taken.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 04:02 PM   #5
Face is offline Face  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Face's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
The difference in price is brass vs. copper.
__________________
"If it measures good and sounds bad, -- it is bad. If it sounds good and measures bad, -- you've measured the wrong thing." Daniel R. von Recklinghausen
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 04:09 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Copper vs brass is an expensive marketing ploy, no functional difference other than brass being a stonger and more durable material.

Mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 04:23 PM   #7
Face is offline Face  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Face's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
If your evaluation of the sound differences(or lack of) between copper and brass termination was using those Ebay RCA's, I wouldn't expect there to be a difference either. They appear identical to Apex Jr's and Vampire's brass RCA's and are all probably from the same source.
__________________
"If it measures good and sounds bad, -- it is bad. If it sounds good and measures bad, -- you've measured the wrong thing." Daniel R. von Recklinghausen
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 06:04 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
Copper vs. brass "sound quality" isn't something I care to debate, but let's say copper is indeed sonically superior.

These brass jacks are all plated, the final plating being gold. Since the currents being carried are usually fairly small, wouldn't skin effect dictate that the signal is mostly being passed along the gold layer? Not to mention gold has a lower resistance than brass.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja

Last edited by theAnonymous1; 13th August 2011 at 06:06 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 06:10 PM   #9
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Skin effect has almost no effect at audio frequencies. It is simply a matter of resistance. A thin gold layer on top of a thick lump of some other metal means that most current will be in the other metal. The gold is there in an attempt to stop the contact from oxidising. I have read, but I forget where, that most gold plating is too thin and soft to do this effectively so is really only of cosmetic value.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011, 06:49 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
Quote:
Originally Posted by DF96 View Post
Skin effect has almost no effect at audio frequencies. It is simply a matter of resistance. A thin gold layer on top of a thick lump of some other metal means that most current will be in the other metal. The gold is there in an attempt to stop the contact from oxidising. I have read, but I forget where, that most gold plating is too thin and soft to do this effectively so is really only of cosmetic value.
Like I alluded to in my previous post; it doesn't matter either way IMO.

I guess if you are the type to think the cost is worth the name brand jacks, then you can probably afford them anyway and it isn't really an issue. I mean I don't think a sane person is going to let their bills go and starve their children just to buy cardas or wbt.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RCA jacks h00hbt Tubes / Valves 3 4th July 2010 01:58 PM
mounting jacks on a wooden chassis preiter Parts 12 5th July 2006 05:51 PM
Seeking gold, ganged RCA panel jacks: GrahamnDodder Chip Amps 6 17th January 2004 08:10 AM
DIY silver RCA panel mount jacks tom1356 Everything Else 4 1st August 2003 05:43 PM
Better RCA/Phono jacks Wardsweb Parts 34 21st July 2003 05:13 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 AM.

Page generated in 0.33613 seconds (26.52% PHP - 73.48% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio