Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th August 2010, 11:30 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Default Treble and Bass cap replacement question

It's about the Pioneer SA-7300 amp again...

Here is a nice pic of the amp with the treble and bass caps
marked in red: http://www.milkbands.co.il/caps.jpg

The disc caps are for the treble and the green ones (NP1) are for
the bass.

What do you recommend doing to improve the sound? to replace them
to which type? Also, i always place the bass pot very low (3 out of 10
in the marks of the face panel) because the bass is very "closed",
very "smudgy", so what can i do to make it more accurate and punchy?

About the treble...i don't like those disc caps...

Also, the right red circle shows the same cap pattern but for the balance
pot. If i mod the bass and treble, would i benefit from replacing the balance caps too?

BTW, Why don't they write the capacitance value on disc caps and NP1 caps? i found them by the copper tracks and not by the values (because
they only have numbers that aren't related to capacitance value as far
as i can see).

What do you guys think?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2010, 11:42 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
I have no idea what your terms closed, smudgy, accurate, and punchy mean. How does the response look with an oscillator and oscilloscope? That is the proper way to measure.

Disc capacitors are fine. They do have a slight voltage coefficient and a little piezoelectric effect, both of which are probably inconsequential. If the idea bothers you, replace with film capacitors.

Most capacitors are marked with value but it's sometimes coded. What markings are on these units?

The life expectancy of ceramic capacitors is very long. Usually the film and, of course, electrolytic capacitors fail far sooner.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 12:08 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob91343 View Post
I have no idea what your terms closed, smudgy, accurate, and punchy mean. How does the response look with an oscillator and oscilloscope? That is the proper way to measure.

Disc capacitors are fine. They do have a slight voltage coefficient and a little piezoelectric effect, both of which are probably inconsequential. If the idea bothers you, replace with film capacitors.

Most capacitors are marked with value but it's sometimes coded. What markings are on these units?

The life expectancy of ceramic capacitors is very long. Usually the film and, of course, electrolytic capacitors fail far sooner.
Well, i don't have an oscillator nor oscilloscope.

Will i benefit anything if i change the ceramics to metalized polypropylene?
will it work without problems?
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 12:33 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Yes it will work with almost any kind of capacitor.

If you plan on doing this sort of stuff I strongly recommend you get an oscilloscope and audio generator. They will pay for themselves in education and to keep you from barking up the wrong tree. The latter is very common; people will glean a snippet of information here and there and come up with some of the most fantastic mythology. When someone uses terms that aren't defined scientifically, I immediately see a red flag. Expressions like 'sonically' and 'sound stage' make me ill.

If you don't understand the theory behind this stuff, there are literally thousands of ways to remedy that. You won't have to get a degree in engineering, although you may at times with you had one.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 05:14 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
musician9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Beautiful Southern Oregon, USA
I don't care for the sound of "disc" caps, or electrolytics, in the signal path (imho), but they are less offensive between the signal path to ground. In most tone stacks with cut, no true boost (0 to 10 instead of -5 to +5), treble caps are in the signal path, bass and midrange caps are not. A schematic of the tone circuits would have been helpful. I'd replace the "disc" caps, and leave the "green" caps. Just one man's opinion.

Dave
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 01:01 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
The bass is actually the thing that bothers me the most.

About learning more about electronics, im doing so everyday since i
started with the whole amp modding, but it's nothing close to really
understanding it.

I would of put more time to this matter if i was to do anything besides the recapping of this specific amp, but this is the only time i need this info,
otherwise i would go and get a degree in electronics.

Link to the schematic:
http://www.milkbands.co.il/Pioneer-SA-7300-int-sch.pdf

Last edited by rg12; 31st August 2010 at 01:11 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 07:04 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
musician9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Beautiful Southern Oregon, USA
If you have listened to your speakers with another receiver and liked the sound of the bass (accurate, punchy), then I would look at the POWER SUPPLY CAPS, not the tone stack caps. The PS caps are the tall cylindrical caps by the bridge rectifier and power transformer. I would use the largest value caps that will fit in the physical space allotted to them. I believe your power supply caps are 8000ufd/50v. I would replace these with 10000ufd/50v or 63v. Replacing the PS caps will stiffen the power supply, increase its reserves, so it has enough juice for punchy accurate bass. If you haven't heard your speakers with another receiver, and been happy with the bass, I would start there.

Dave
__________________
true intelligence is not knowledge but imagination
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 11:03 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
When i did the recap, i replaced the two 8000uF 50v caps to 10000uF 50v caps (Nichicon KG Series, gold tube or fine tune, one of the two).

I haven't heard the speakers with anything else.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010, 05:22 PM   #9
macboy is offline macboy  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by rg12 View Post
BTW, Why don't they write the capacitance value on disc caps and NP1 caps? i found them by the copper tracks and not by the values (because
they only have numbers that aren't related to capacitance value as far
as i can see).
They should be marked with 3 digits something like:
104 or
333 or
685

104 = 10e4 or (10 * 104) pF = 100000 pF = 100 nF = 0.1 uF
333 = 33e3 or (33 * 103) pF = 33 nF = 0.033 uF
685 = 6.8 uF
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bass and treble control...how? Denis.BR Chip Amps 21 30th November 2007 03:32 AM
nominal bass and treble peace brainerd Solid State 5 21st November 2005 12:41 AM
No bass / No Treble But Bass And treble Help! jleaman Analog Line Level 11 29th October 2005 06:45 AM
Input cap (2.2uF) / 50k pot (bass roll-off) question: GrahamnDodder Chip Amps 6 23rd September 2003 09:32 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.

Page generated in 0.11935 seconds (81.84% PHP - 18.16% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio