|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Like for example, OPA2604. instead of OPA2604?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Probably for a similar reason as there is a ? after OPA2604?
jd
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
|
Perhaps if we knew what catalog those clips were from... Never mind, google finds those are Farnell stock numbers.
Since this occurs in part numbers from two different sources of two different series, my initial reaction would be that it represents some distinction in the catalog house's system. Such things as whether they are lead free or not often get noted in part numbers. SInce the alternative parts seem to link to the same data sheets from the manufacturers, I am led to guess the dot has to do with alternative sources for the same part. A quick query to Farnell ought to answer this. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
he, if you read it all, its obvious they have problemes with typing
(18-Jun-2010; (18-Jun-201; looks funny, eh even if same type and code number, still different parts number.....maybe thats what dot indicates I suspect error comes from software error due to communication error like if two identical parts are stored with different explanations a software "think" they are different just two different people typing different about the same part dot is manually placed at the important number, by which they are sorted by software, and alike |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
NOPB Lead free
or Tube packing
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
jd
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: under the rainclouds
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
In case of the 2604 one is a tube of 50 pieces, the other is a single chip.
edit: and with the 4562 the one is US stocked and the other is local stock. I can see why they would need two exactly the same parts but with different order codes due to these differences. They probalby have some technical reason why the mfg. part number cannot be exactly the same so they add the dot to differentiate. Last edited by mace1337; 6th August 2010 at 12:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Has it got the right number of legs,
yes/no Does the device number appear correct, yes/no Is the package correct yes/no Three "yes's" get 'em ordered and stop worrying
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fet dravers part number? | Bad silver | Car Audio | 2 | 22nd June 2009 05:52 PM |
| Jfet part number | mmerig | Parts | 5 | 23rd September 2007 04:19 PM |
| Need part number for a transformer | bluegti | Chip Amps | 16 | 27th December 2006 03:06 AM |
| Part Number search (MOSFET) | sup2jzgte | Parts | 3 | 27th January 2006 08:06 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11767 seconds (82.07% PHP - 17.93% MySQL) with 10 queries |