|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Feketeerdő
|
Hi,
I am working on a simple DAC and after reading the article from Guido Tent about supply decoupling I decided that I implement those suggestions. As I got so far, to finalize the design I had to choose the parts. I need a 47uH inductor. I searched for one. What I found (here in Hungary) is for example a Ferrocore product, with the following parameters: 47uH inductance Q:50 (test freq:2.52MHz) Selfresonance freq: 12MHz DC resistance: 5.8Ohm As I studied these parameters several questions came to my mind. Guido Tent writes, that the inductor helps to create a local loop by dominating the loop with its bigger value, therefore the resonance frequency will drop and stay away from the possible resonance of the PCB. Better yet, a ferrit bead can be used to introduce some series resistance (about 100Ohm), therefore the Q of the system will be lower. The questions: - This inductor has a SRF at 12MHz. That is not so far off from the frequencies used in D/A chips. Isn't that a really bad thing here? - The resistance parameter is just for DC, there is no data available how this resistance varies with frequency. Guido writes, that 100Ohm at 100Mhz is good. Could be a solution to parallel a 100Ohm with this inductance? Also, the first thing I can read in the datasheet is: "Special magnetic core structure contributes to high Q and Self-Resonant Frequencies". While I need a solution where Q is low and I am not sure, that in this application the SRF is a good thing. Any ideas? What kind of inductor should I use for supply decoupling? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Feketeerdő
|
Just for the record here is what I found after searching further:
- the inductor I found is not recommended in this application. Oscillation can occur as I feared. I got a suggestion to use a Panasonic device (809-4950 - Farnell). That goes to the TORX receiver. - Supply decoupling for the DAC chip and the receiver can be done with a ferrite bead (and not really an inductor). At least this is what I found at Twisted Pear Audio Opus project. They have about 600Ohm@100Mhz but no inductance is specified. Anyway, it seems to work so probably more than 1uH...(Murata - BLM31PG601SN1L) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Power Supply Decoupling | rtarbell | Power Supplies | 42 | 23rd April 2006 02:40 PM |
| tantalum caps in power supply/decoupling | svokke | Parts | 8 | 23rd April 2003 12:30 PM |
| 2.2mH inductor in Aleph3 Power supply | vsr123 | Pass Labs | 10 | 9th April 2003 02:04 AM |
| OSCONS better than BGs in all Power supply decoupling? | PhopsonNY | Parts | 7 | 31st December 2002 02:38 PM |
| Power supply decoupling capacitors (beginner question) | bm_mode | Solid State | 5 | 26th March 2002 01:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07052 seconds (71.14% PHP - 28.86% MySQL) with 10 queries |