Capacitors and double-blind listening tests - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th May 2003, 09:11 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haarlem, the Netherlands
Default Capacitors and double-blind listening tests

Dear all,

Over the past 20 years or so, many articles have been written proving beyond any doubt that there are quality differences between capacitors. For example, capacitors produce distortion which depends strongly on their dielectric and construction. A recent series in Electronics World shows that class II and III ceramics are the very worst, unipolar electrolytic capacitors are better, bipolar electrolytics are better than unipolar ones and so on, the very best types being polystyrene, polypropylene and class I ceramic capacitors. Further, other articles show that dielectric absorption produces measurable differences in the small-signal step response (or equivalently in the magnitude and/or phase response) of an RC high-pass compared to an ideal first-order high-pass.

However, except for the worst types, capacitor distortion is extremely small and the differences in small-signal response between a high-pass with a dielectrically absorbing capacitor and a perfect first-order high-pass is very small compared to the difference between an ideal first-order high-pass and a straight wire (no high-pass at all). Therefore, it seems logical to assume that as long as all RC time constants are high enough and as long as you don't use class II or III ceramic capacitors, it doesn't matter much what type of capacitor you use for DC blocking.

Nevertheless, most audiophiles claim to hear clear differences between capacitor types. Has anyone seen any articles about double-blind listening tests supporting these claims? If not, is there anyone in the neighbourhood of Haarlem willing to participate in a simple double-blind test, using a home-made ABX switch box?

Thanks in advance for your answers and/or insults,
Marcel van de Gevel
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2003, 11:31 PM   #2
moamps is offline moamps  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
Hi,

I'm sorry that nobody seems interested in participating in this discussion. For what it's worth, I'd like to share some of my thoughts on caps.
EW articles are written very seriously and with expected results, of which about 90% are applicable in practice IMHO. However, testing conditions (DC offset, current thru cap, etc.) and working condition can differ. Some people claim that caps behave differently in extreme conditions (mechanical vibration, magnetic field), which may account for the remaining 10% of the results. Also, total distortion for most capacitor types is so very low that although I've seen many regular elcos in several consoles, I've never been able to hear any distortion.
If there are any differences between capacitor types, I don't think it is possible to hear them at first listening. For this reason, I think that double-blind tests are pretty useless. I regret that I'm not in your neighbourhood to come to your test, though. After a few cans of beer I bet I would be able to hear a lot of distortion coming from those little black ones.

Regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2003, 06:21 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
Default Cheap Improvement.

A while back, I changed the caps in cheap 'Whu Flung Dhung' DVD player.
I had a second example as a reference (both brand new), and I first changed the DSP pcb audio signal electros to Hitano EXR low esr caps.
The sonic difference was clearly audible wrt to the virgin one.
Next I changed the supply bypass caps on the DSP pcb to the same Hitanos.
Again quite a difference to the stock unit.
Next I changed the SMPS secondary side caps to Hitano EXR and again quite a difference wrt the stock unit.

The end result was that the modded item sounded extremely good indeed.
Overall distortion and IMD clouding were dramatically reduced, and music extended both lower and higher.
Detail and depth imaging was much improved, whilst more relaxing sounding overall.
For about $5.00 and minimal effort, this produced a very nice to live with sound.
I have also changed cheap looking coupling caps in pro gear to Hitano EXR, and I get nice improvement every time.

I say that electros can be strongly audible, and in my experience the Hitano EXR ones are nicely pleasant sounding - they have very little self sound really, but their sound is always less than, and different to the originals in my experience.

Eric.
__________________
I believe not to believe in any fixed belief system.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2003, 11:17 AM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zamboanga, City of Flowers, Mindanao
Send a message via Yahoo to Elso Kwak
Thumbs up Re: Capacitors and double-blind listening tests

Quote:
Originally posted by MarcelvdG
Dear all,

If not, is there anyone in the neighbourhood of Haarlem willing to participate in a simple double-blind test, using a home-made ABX switch box?

Thanks in advance for your answers and/or insults,
Marcel van de Gevel

Hi Marcel,
I would love to participate in your double blind testing if that makes you happy.
I usually live a while with the modded cap. Double blind testing is too complicated for me. If in doubt I sometimes switch back to the old situation. I am not doing scientific research and luckyly I don't have to prove anything!
The audibility of changes to the sound is very dependent on the installation used especially the speakers.
I remember a friend of mine trying to sell a expensive moving coil cartridge to a guy with a rather cheap set. When the cartridge was installed nobody heard any difference. But on Klipschorns the differences were clearly audible.
My most recent experiments indicate most polypropyle film caps ring like hel......Or does the CD ring....? Still not sure........
Polycarbonate seem better in this respect but leaves out some information, perhaps.
At the DAC output with some 6.5V DC riding on the signal some old polycarbonate ERO KC1854 sounded better than ERO MKC1862.
The screaming quality on some bad CD's was reduced a lot compared to MKP caps like Audyn or Audyn Plus.
As the non-metalised ERO's sounded better than the metallised I am inclined to try non-metallised polypropylene like Hovland, Ero KP1832 as sold NOS by Steinmusic Germany or Arcotronics from www.rswww.com in UK.
The latter two suggestions courtesy of Thorsten Loesch.

As concerns mesurements I doubt a meaningfull test is available.
I have a capacitance tester that can measure the Q or dissipation factor of the cap.
Polypropylenes usually have a Q > 999.(limit of measurement)
Polycarbonate 600
Polyester about 180
Metallised paper from AR3a loudspeaker: 16
Oscon about 10
Blackgate about 5 and dropping! Value keeps dropping during several minutes. Burn in phenomenon???
Ordinary electrolytic 4.3
Please note the measurement frequency is 1kHz.
How these values correlate with the listening experience? I have no idea
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2003, 12:03 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Default dbt

Marcel,

Although I am not really in your area, I would be interested to spend the time to come up to Haarlem from Maastricht for this.
I don't think I am an experienced golden ear, but would like to try. I have one or two friends that I think DO have golden ears, who might be interested as well. Please keep me informed of your plans.

Jan Didden

PS I do enjoy your articles in the journals!
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2003, 12:11 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Haarlem, the Netherlands
Dear Elso and Jan,

I guess we better discuss the details by e-mail rather than on this forum. I haven't really thought about the exact procedure yet. The equipment, listening room and procedure used have to be such that the capacitor audibility is optimised according to the test persons believing in capacitor audibility. I guess I need your input for that.

By the way, Jan, when you wrote "PS I do enjoy your articles in the journals!", did you mean the series of articles by Cyril Bateman in Electronics World that I referred to in the first message in this thread? Or did you mean the few articles I have written? In either case, I'm glad you enjoyed them.

Marcel
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2003, 12:37 AM   #7
Cobra2 is offline Cobra2  Norway
DIY !
diyAudio Member
 
Cobra2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Send a message via Skype™ to Cobra2
Default Caps...

Hi!
I have often used these bi-polar caps with good result!
(but never compared w. Black Gates - bi-polar).
Anyway, they are cheap!

http://www.rswww.com/cgi-bin/bv/brow...toid=-92506771


Arne K
__________________
Don't believe everything you think...
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2003, 01:50 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Slightly North of Portland
Gentleman:

First;

Three big cheers for the simple truth, Marcel, and a couple more for the support, Moamps.

Second;

I also believe that some people hear differences between quality capacitors that have been changed in an audio circuit. But, I believe that the real differences are more due to changes in the solder joint or other effects of heat then the capacitors. There are also cases where the different physical configurations of different capacators result in a different response to RF frequencies. This can change the "mud" level in an audio circuit.

Except for relative frequency (relative pitch) and phase differences (sound source location) hearing is one of the least precise human sense and the one most easily miss-analyzed by the mind.

Finally:

A wise man once said; "One mans passion is often another mans poison" and there by hangs the best of arguments.



The laws of physics always apply.

The real question is;
which ones this time?

Tmac
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th May 2003, 07:09 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
jan.didden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Great City of Turnhout, Belgium
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally posted by MarcelvdG
Dear Elso and Jan,

I guess we better discuss the details by e-mail rather than on this forum. I haven't really thought about the exact procedure yet. The equipment, listening room and procedure used have to be such that the capacitor audibility is optimised according to the test persons believing in capacitor audibility. I guess I need your input for that.

By the way, Jan, when you wrote "PS I do enjoy your articles in the journals!", did you mean the series of articles by Cyril Bateman in Electronics World that I referred to in the first message in this thread? Or did you mean the few articles I have written? In either case, I'm glad you enjoyed them.

Marcel
I meant your articles (and reader letters) in EW and I think also in another journal.

Jan Didden
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2003, 03:39 PM   #10
patch is offline patch  United States
diyAudio Member
 
patch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Smile Paper Caps in Xovers

My school-age kids have excellent hearing, and I rely on their opinions about how my diy speakers and amps sound. For speakers they usually prefer the sound that comes with good paper caps in the crossover (right, the ones sold by Tony and Gintaras on eBay). For the electronics...well, they like 2nd order harmonics...that's a tube design question, not a cap question. Oh, interestingly, they love the AR3a sound for rock.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2