Hi all,
In searching for replacement regulators for my Cyrus amp, I came across a Farnell bargain!
They have a few hundred non-RoHS compliant KA317 and KA337 Fairchild regulators in stock, which they're flogging at a lower price to get rid of the old stock. This seems like a great deal, and I'm certainly not bothered about RoHS compliance for my amp.
In case you're interested:
Fairchild Semiconductor KA337 19p/ea @ Farnell
Fairchild Semiconductor KA317 21p/ea @ Farnell
However, I just want to check that the KA chips are really equivalent to the LM series. Comparing the datasheets side-by-side, the figures look identical. I just wanted to check before I get tripped up by this. The amp has LM317 and LM337 chips at the moment.
Thanks
In searching for replacement regulators for my Cyrus amp, I came across a Farnell bargain!
They have a few hundred non-RoHS compliant KA317 and KA337 Fairchild regulators in stock, which they're flogging at a lower price to get rid of the old stock. This seems like a great deal, and I'm certainly not bothered about RoHS compliance for my amp.
In case you're interested:
Fairchild Semiconductor KA337 19p/ea @ Farnell
Fairchild Semiconductor KA317 21p/ea @ Farnell
However, I just want to check that the KA chips are really equivalent to the LM series. Comparing the datasheets side-by-side, the figures look identical. I just wanted to check before I get tripped up by this. The amp has LM317 and LM337 chips at the moment.
Thanks
Haha, I hadn't actually expected a discussion like this, but I guess this is the place! My primary concern was any practical reason that the KAs wouldn't work.mjf said:i think the difference is small (compared to lm..........) but - as always - big enough to beginn a high end discussion......
Okay, now we've established that they'll work: what differences do you think there are mjf? Does anyone have some measured results to support an acoustic difference?
On a side note, I found a comment on Head-Fi (via Google) that the Fairchild chips were found to be less reliable than National Semiconductor in a particular project. Should I be concerned about this? I'm not entirely sure how they were being used (as CCS I suspect).
smiler said:Okay, now we've established that they'll work: what differences do you think there are mjf? Does anyone have some measured results to support an acoustic difference?
hello.
there is a thread in power supply design:
annother look at the lm317.................
by jbau
greetings...............
Aren't there some regulators from Linear Technology which perform BETTER than the National Semiconductor originals? I don't know if they'd make an audible difference, but it's more likely to be audible than, say, making connections with "silver wire w/natural unbleached cotton tubing" to quote something funny I just read elsewhere.
Never underestimate the power of cotton tubingdangus said:Aren't there some regulators from Linear Technology which perform BETTER than the National Semiconductor originals? I don't know if they'd make an audible difference, but it's more likely to be audible than, say, making connections with "silver wire w/natural unbleached cotton tubing" to quote something funny I just read elsewhere.
How does Fairchild fair then? Is the performance difference accountable to some measured difference (perhaps evident in the data sheets?). For my purposes, I'm satisfied that the KA317/377 is up to the job, especially at only 20p each! I'm interested this discussion though...
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Design & Build
- Parts
- KA3x7 vs LM3x7; is there a difference & bargain price