|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
I just replaced the filter caps in a tube crossover, and it now take the fuse out on power up. (yes, I put 'em in correctly)
I suspect the new caps have a much lower initial impedance and the inrush current is too much. I'm using Cornell-Dublier, and the values and voltages are correct. Anyone out there have any suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Arkansas
|
If they are the same value as the originals, and installed properly - polarity wise - then you're probably right in assuming they are drawing more charge current.
You could try using a small wattage light bulb in series with the AC line to see if current limiting helps. If so, you can build a soft start ciruit, or simply add a thermistor in the AC line, which is what I do. I get mine from old PC power supplies.
__________________
Writing is good exercize for the texticles! |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Thanks- I hadn't thought about the light bulb, but it makes sense. I''l give it a try in a few minutes. If that doesn't work, I'll try to track down a variac.
So, I'm wondering if perhaps the lytics need to be "formed" on their first power up and will behave on subsequent power ups? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Is the capacitance higher in the new caps?
__________________
Building a 2.1 system out of a 3/4"x4'x8' sheet |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
No- same value and voltage. The new caps are considerably smaller than the originals, but they read the correct capacity on a cap tester.
I rigged a supply to output the rated B+ (450 vdc) and hooked it up to a variac I borrowed. I'm raising the voltage 5 volts or so every couple of hours until I get to +450. Hopefully, that will form the caps and they'll behave after this treatment. If you guys have and old HAM radio enthusiast in your neighborhood, get to know him. They know a LOT of tube and HV tricks. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Quote:
See this link for good general outline: http://www.vcomp.co.uk/tech_tips/ref...eform_caps.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
presumably the mains transformer is an EI. This should not need a soft start but a small benefit will accrue if you choose to use one. The slow charge circuit can be a Power Thermistor in the secondary circuit to limit the peak charging current. This will be very beneficial. Fit it. A light bulb will not do, it is PTC, you need NTC.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Quote:
It is wrong to suggest that staged charging is less effective than gradually increasing charging. Ultimately the di-electric film will be the same thickness and it will suit the final voltage. I use much higher resistor values to achieve much slower re-forming.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Quote:
You may well be right that ultimately the dielectric layer will be the same thickness. What I am struggling with is the advantage of staging the voltage or of slow reforming. Certainly I have never seen it recommended by any manufacturer. Has your experience been that sow reaging will ultimately lead to a lower leakage current for the reaged capacitor. Or is there some other benefit that I'm missing? Matthew |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
I find leakage currents after slow re-forming between ten times and one thousand times lower than specification.
I asked for comment a while back, but got no replies.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sa-5.1 blow fuse | jpweaner2 | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 3rd May 2007 01:36 PM |
| Soundstream SA 245 - Blow Fuse | babygot | Car Audio | 4 | 7th January 2005 05:06 PM |
| Two power supplies blow fuse | h_andree | Chip Amps | 14 | 4th September 2004 02:09 AM |
| Fried a slow blow 4 A fuse | chris ma | Everything Else | 2 | 10th October 2003 06:59 AM |
| Tube amp fuse blow out | Gabevee | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 4th March 2002 03:55 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10460 seconds (82.35% PHP - 17.65% MySQL) with 10 queries |