|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
As we all know, "good" signal coupling caps tend to be large..... very large. Which of the below caps would be considered to be the best of this bad bunch? I know this is a subjective topic, but I don't want this to turn into another big cap debate (I know, odd request considering the topic).
SMD X7R SMD Tantalum Electrolytic (Like Panasonic FC/FM, not exotics like balckgate) Sanyo OSCON WIMA MKS (PET)
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
Cyril Batemann measured distortion in "capacitor Sound" articles - for big C his recommendation is non-polar Al electrolytic with generous V rating 35 V+ for signal levels, 2 such Caps in series were better for signals larger than a few V
the former audiophile recommendation of biased series polar caps didn't measure as well all film caps measured better than the best electrolytic other considerations might include the physical size - a large loop formed by soup can sized audiophile caps could easliy form better attennas for EMI any DC bias turns a Cap into a microphone - again audiophile wound film/foil caps could be worse on this charateristic |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
Quote:
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
yet another consideration is that any Cap distortion would be expected to be porportional to the signal Vdrop across it - "super sizing" with Al electro may still be competive sound-wise if it can be hugely larger in value in the same space
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
If going surface mount, I'd suggest Panasonic ECP-U (available from Digikey) or Cornell Dubilier FCA (available from Mouser). I know they go up to at least 1.0 uF. I've used these in portable devices to good effect. FWIW, my ears find MKS disagreeable in a signal coupling function. Don't forget about Elna Silmic II. These are cheap and available in big uF sizes. They're among my favorites for headphone coupling.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
Thanks for the heads-up on the Panasonic ECP-U. They are relatively cheap and would still have a compact profile even if stacked two or three high.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Budget electrolytic cap for signal coupling | 100db | Digital Line Level | 7 | 5th February 2009 01:39 PM |
| Evil Experiments - Hammond Paper in Oil Caps | korneluk | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 6th January 2009 02:50 PM |
| Op Amp chips in the signal path - evil or not evil ? | thylantyr | Solid State | 19 | 25th July 2008 05:43 PM |
| XA60.5 - Is there a coupling cap in the signal path ? | Blitz | Pass Labs | 3 | 20th April 2008 09:55 PM |
| X2 MKP mains cap for signal coupling | DECKY999 | Parts | 3 | 11th March 2008 12:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07828 seconds (75.41% PHP - 24.59% MySQL) with 10 queries |