Passive or Active Crossover before amp - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th May 2009, 10:05 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Goulburn NSW
Default Passive or Active Crossover before amp

Hi all looking for a bit advice on what is a pretty specific set-up.

I have built a set of open baffles which have 2 by 12 inch drivers for bass per side on a separate amp and two sets of main drivers which can be swapped out as desired, these consist of either 4 inch full range or 10 inch coax. The coax is for rock/orchestral and the 4s for jazz acoustic.

Now here is the issue:

I need to roll off the frequencies below 160hz, I don't need a steep cut basically 6 to 12db per decade would be fine, this way I can get cleaner sound from the dedicated gainclone amps and also keep the 4 inch full range drivers operating in a linear fashion. It wouldn't matter too much with the coaxs but it still should clean things up a bit. I know I could of course use a cap on the speakers, but I am really wanting to optimise the amplification so cutting out low frequencies before amplification is the way to go.

So I can use an active crossover ( high pass) or I assume a simple passive capacitor set up.

I realise that normally for full 2 or 3 way crossovers active is the go, but in this case I don't need a steep cut off , in fact it is not desirable, and I am trying to keep the whole signal path as clean as possible. The whole system is run from batteries and speaker efficiency is very high so a loss of a couple of db here and there doesn't bother me at all, the main issue is resolution and signal integrity.

I know that active in theory should be better, but then all I really need is high pass and even most active high pass filters ( I have seen) contain a series of small caps plus a couple of opamps, so when it is all said and done they must detract something from the signal as well.

Either way it is no great issue for me to go either way construction wise, all that matters is the final result.

So what do we think active or passive and if passive what way should I go (ie cap choice etc).
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 12:17 PM   #2
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Marchand makes a passive XM46 to be placed in signal line before amps, but pretty expencive
__________________
sometimes we know very little, and sometimes we know too much
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Changing a passive crossover to active soundengine355 Multi-Way 101 18th August 2008 04:50 PM
Passive crossover into active crossover hahfran Multi-Way 16 10th February 2008 06:16 PM
subwoofer crossover passive and active yikchean Subwoofers 3 3rd December 2006 02:18 PM
high pass crossover - active, passive, simple or complex? nick78 Parts 1 23rd May 2006 06:43 AM
using passive crossover before amps to active biamp? cowanrg Multi-Way 7 29th October 2004 01:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2