Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th December 2008, 05:23 PM   #41
diyAudio Member
 
jneutron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: away
Quote:
Originally posted by bear
Well, despite SY's saying that the tube guys would benefit, most of the "heavy hitters" don't probably come and read anything in this section...

Thus the lack of activity... it would be nice for those with some chops in this area to get involved!!

I hearby tender the motion for moving this thread to a more oft read forum section.

Perhaps dump a link into the Tube section for those interested to follow over? Putting this one into Solid State...
Bear, your words are looking more and more astute...

Just measured some stuff..

Using a Coby mp3 player(list price 9.99), 1/8th inch stereo jack (freebie with the player) feeding into a Behringer UB502(list price 49.99), 1/4 mono jacks (list price 1.49)..this feeding an NAD receiver of some kind (inherited). (yes, I know it's all esoteric high end stuff, that's why I included the prices, to bowl you all over with envy..).

Used the HP current clamp meter over the line cord (two prong) and over the IC after the split...

Saw the music through the line cord..not much, but there in the noise.

Saw a little bit of signal when I clamped over the right channel of the IC...again, terribly far down into the noise.

Gotta make a better current pickup, the HP was 100 mV per amp, I need sensitivity at least 2 orders of magitude better to see what I want.

Spoke to one of the physicists about the problem of the two IC's tying a source to an amp....tried to trick him.. Said, with that setup, are the IC's really shielding their signals...

His answer: Yes, at 50%.. bummer, I was really hoping to trick him...

Cheers, John
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2008, 07:15 PM   #42
diyAudio Member
 
auplater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KyOhWVa tristate
Default cable morphology

Quote:
Originally posted by jneutron


<snip>

Spoke to one of the physicists about the problem of the two IC's tying a source to an amp....tried to trick him.. Said, with that setup, are the IC's really shielding their signals...

His answer: Yes, at 50%.. bummer, I was really hoping to trick him...

Cheers, John
hey John...

Maybe twisting cables such as this would solve the "which side is ground, which side hot" conundrum, as it would be self-quenching

interesting thread...

PS: PM me, maybe I can fix some solder tools...
Attached Images
File Type: gif mobius4.gif (4.3 KB, 429 views)
__________________
"...His brain is squirming like a toad..." Jim Morrison
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2008, 09:01 PM   #43
diyAudio Member
 
jneutron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: away
Default Re: cable morphology

Quote:
Originally posted by auplater


hey John...

Maybe twisting cables such as this would solve the "which side is ground, which side hot" conundrum, as it would be self-quenching

interesting thread...

PS: PM me, maybe I can fix some solder tools...
Ya gotta love it..

Hey, where'd you get "quenching" from...

Thanks for the offer.

Cheers, John
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2008, 05:29 PM   #44
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
banging the nail on the head...
beating the dead horse...
floggin da mule...



"Discuss what are and where to get and how to make the best bits. PCB's, Caps, Transformers. "




I really want this thread to get some serious input and debate - I don't know enough about the topic to say much of import...


_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th December 2008, 04:13 AM   #45
diyAudio Member
 
bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
<bump>

Geez, I don't want to kill the thing!!

More input was the idea...

_-_-bear
__________________
_-_-bear
http://www.bearlabs.com ...ur feeback please - like/dislike my what I have written? PM/email tnx. --
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th December 2008, 12:56 PM   #46
diyAudio Member
 
auplater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KyOhWVa tristate
Default practical vs. theory

Hey John...

I've always had a little difficulty grasping the practical aspects of band theory applied to all the practical effects of what goes on in bulk metal components that are imperfect; i.e., have grain boundaries, impurities in both composition and structure, that sort of thing.

What with all the focus on supposed cable conduction differences that seems to be the rage in certain circles, and your detailed look at grounding concerns, care to comment on using band theory (or not) to help predict what's going on from practical aspects. (or is it a useless construct attempting to quantify something best left to empirical determination)?

John L.
__________________
"...His brain is squirming like a toad..." Jim Morrison
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 06:43 PM   #47
diyAudio Member
 
myhrrhleine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avalon Island
So, is this thread finished?
__________________
Just because you can't hear it doesn't mean no one can.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2009, 08:04 PM   #48
dmills is offline dmills  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Well AES54 is just out (With a few errors in some of the drawings), and is an interesting read, and Jim Brown has just pointed out on the pro audio mailing list that he has a paper aimed at ham radio operators, but with much that is relevant to RFI in an audio context at: http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf

In fact a lot of his stuff at:http://audiosystemsgroup.com/publish is well worth the time.

Regards, Dan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2009, 01:31 AM   #49
diyAudio Member
 
Speedskater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakewood, Ohio
Quote:
Originally posted by myhrrhleine
So, is this thread finished?
It looks like jneutron has been away since December 17th.
__________________
Kevin
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2011, 02:28 PM   #50
diyAudio Member
 
johnferrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by jneutron View Post
I am the first to admit that what I've stated, that of wrapping the power cables together, or even the pre cable wrapped around the IC's, seems counterintuitive..but it is not. It works, and works very well
Do you have in mind 2 or 3 turns per foot ?


.
__________________
Michael Gazzaniga - "The arts are not frosting but baking soda."
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ground loops, speaker hum and buz steevo Solid State 15 31st October 2008 09:58 PM
UK laws - dealing with ground loops? johnm Power Supplies 9 4th August 2008 03:05 PM
Safety question concerning ground loops derMichi Chip Amps 5 9th June 2006 08:31 AM
P3A and ground loops biff584 Solid State 5 14th March 2003 02:21 PM
Earth/Ground Loops JohnClark Tubes / Valves 2 14th November 2001 12:49 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:41 AM.

Page generated in 0.12899 seconds (82.88% PHP - 17.12% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio