
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
13th February 2008, 03:14 AM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007

LP & HP Filters & Crossovers, a few newb questions...
When making speaker boxes and different set ups, crossovers seem to be where the biggest whole is in product selection. Getting just what you need for your specific application is difficult or impossible. So I figured I need to learn how to make them. Anyways, to my questions...
I got a program that will give me the LP/HP filter design for a set frequency & ohm load. Example... I know I prolly' cant find capacitors and inductors with the correct rating to the 0.01 decimal point, but I figured to the tenth decimal point or so would be close enough. Problem is that when I am looking up these things I cant read the rating system correctly. Many say rated at like 220v, plus getting correct ohm rating of unit. Plus wiring these two setups parallel into a 4ohm load at the amp shouldnt change anything should it seeing the terminal load at the speaker is still 8ohms. 
13th February 2008, 04:12 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northern California

This circuit has an actual input impedance of 8 Ohms. The crossover feeds only the woofer below 720Hz or the tweeter above 720Hz. At any given frequency, they aren't really in parallel.
You can safely round off the values: 29.47 uF = 30 uF 14.74 uF = 15 uF 44.21 uF = 45 uF Inductors are fine as marked except 1.06mH can be 1.00 mH Capacitor voltage ratings for this circuit should be 50V or more. Do not use standard electrolytic capacitors, you must use bipolar types. Many people will pay extra for a film capacitor instead of an electrolytic because they tend to sound better. 
14th February 2008, 06:54 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004

Do you have any datasheets on the drivers you are using? The reason I ask is that very rarely will the crossover parts align with a textbook calculation for the rated impedance of the drivers. Even though it may be an "8 ohm" woofer, the impedance at for example 2500Hz may be 11 ohms or more! With datasheets of the impedance curves and frequency responses, we can at least get close to the crossover values needed. The caveat here is that the frequency response will depend on the enclosure in which the driver is used to some extent, and you will never really know what that is unless you measure the driver in the enclosure yourself.
Let's do a case study of Zaph's popular new SR71 design here: http://www.zaphaudio.com/SR71.html The crossover schematic looks pretty straightforward You have what looks like a standard 2nd order electrical crossover topology. The tweeter circuit has two added components for top end response shaping (C4 and R5), and the green boxed components are optional for impedance flattening. Here is Zaph's measured response: Looking at the meat of the crossover: C1, L2, L7 and C9; lets compare what Zaph used to what is calculated from a textbook crossover calculator. Using the calculator here: http://www.lalena.com/Audio/Calculator/XOver/ Inputting the rated impedance of the tweeter (6 ohms) and woofer (8 ohms); and inputting the crossover frequency (1750 Hz) and type (2nd order LinkwitzRiley), we get the following values. Related to the figure above, C1 would be 7.58uF, L2 would be 1.09mH, L7 would be 1.46mH, and C9 would be 5.69uF. Here are the results plotted with Speaker Workshop. This speaker, if built, would have absolutely no midbass or bass, and would have screeching high midrange and treble. So what happened? The ER18RNX in this case has a rising response; to flatten this out requires more inductance than the textbook formula provides. Using the textbook inductor, the response of the ER18RNX stays at reference level until nearly 5kHz, where it drops off very sharply. There is a bobble in the phase response in this area as well, due to the ER18RNX having a cone mode with a peak at 5kHz. This causes the ER18RNX and the 27TDFC to be quite mismatched in phase and results in a suck out around 5kHz. The larger than textbook inductor also provides Baffle Step Compensation (BSC) by beginning the electrical rolloff at a lower frequency, effectively boosting the bass and midbass. This is a trick that works well with woofers that have rising response, and is something that a textbook design would have difficulty implementing without much trial and error. The 27TDFC in Zaph's design has been tuned to compensate for the woofers rising response and doubles to tilt the listening axis upwards to align it with the tweeter. The crossover rolls the tweeter off at a much higher acoustic slope by combining the natural rolloff of the tweeter with the electrical filter rolloff. The resulting inductor value is no where near what the textbook filter would recommend. It is nuances like these that make crossover designing both a science and an art. I think you will find that textbook filters work best when the crossover frequency is more than an octave (double or half the frequency) away from the usable flat response of the drivers. Even then, it is still going to be hit or miss, with quite frankly more misses than hits. A far better way to calculate the crossover frequency would be to use the free tools here: http://www.pvconsultants.com/audio/frdgroup.htm If you need further help, feel free to ask! Regards, David 
16th February 2008, 08:50 AM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007

Thanks for the info. Unfortunately a lot of what you say is over my head. I have read up a little, yet havent got to the point where I know enough about the science so that I can calculate according to impedance curves. I plan on getting to that point though. Just am kinda busy with other stuff at this time. I am saving all of the sites, I will read up on it.
But, for the time being I got a question for you. The 2/3 way cross over calculators at LaLena.com look helpful. If I run 3/2 8ohm speakers through these plans, these are designed to keep the impedance at 8homs (or which ever) on the channel? I know that the LP/HP filter design I have should drop my impedance if I wired multiple speakers to the same channel. And, how much will using LPads affect this. Think I should use an LPad before or after the crossover? 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Newb question about impedence curve and crossovers?  JohnnyP00  MultiWay  1  10th January 2009 05:35 PM 
Newb Questions  mpw01  MultiWay  7  4th March 2008 03:35 PM 
1st order filters/crossovers with proper drivers compared to full range?  tech.knockout  MultiWay  8  15th May 2006 07:52 AM 
Active crossovers and notch filters  Saurav  MultiWay  15  26th February 2004 10:25 PM 
Questions, questions, from newb DIYer  Phatman91624  MultiWay  41  3rd August 2002 03:52 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 