ROHS vs non-ROHS compliant components - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th January 2008, 08:50 PM   #1
mtl777 is offline mtl777  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default ROHS vs non-ROHS compliant components

Are non-ROHS compliant components generally better performing than their ROHS compliant counterparts? Given the same component that is available as either ROHS or non-ROHS compliant, which one would you prefer to use (assuming your application does not require ROHS compliance)?

In particular, I am using lead-based 60/40 solder and am wondering if it is better to buy the non-ROHS compliant Chemicon KMG series capacitors for use with this type of solder than to buy the EKMG ROHS compliant version of the same series. What do you think?

In general, if your application does not require ROHS compliance, which of the following is best as far as performance is concerned (not considering any environmental/health issues)?

1. Use non-ROHS solder with non-ROHS component;
2. Use non-ROHS solder with ROHS component;
3. Use ROHS solder with ROHS component;
4. Use ROHS solder with non-ROHS component.

Lastly, I still have lots of 60Sn/40Pb solder and would rather not switch to lead-free, but sometimes a component is available only as ROHS compliant. Is it OK to use this solder with ROHS compliant components or do I have to use lead-free?

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2008, 09:20 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
theAnonymous1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
Default Re: ROHS vs non-ROHS compliant components

Quote:
Originally posted by mtl777
Are non-ROHS compliant components generally better performing than their ROHS compliant counterparts?
I'm no expert, but most devices I have seen that come in both RoHS and non-RoHS have the same specs listed, so performance should be the same.

Quote:
Originally posted by mtl777
Given the same component that is available as either ROHS or non-ROHS compliant, which one would you prefer to use (assuming your application does not require ROHS compliance)?
If RoHS is not a requirement (as it's not here in the US), then non-RoHS is preferred.(google for "tin whiskers and RoHS")

Quote:
Originally posted by mtl777
In particular, I am using lead-based 60/40 solder and am wondering if it is better to buy the non-ROHS compliant Chemicon KMG series capacitors for use with this type of solder than to buy the EKMG ROHS compliant version of the same series. What do you think?
RoHS components will solder fine with any lead based solder, so the RoHS compliant capacitor is fine in terms of solderability.

Quote:
Originally posted by mtl777
In general, if your application does not require ROHS compliance, which of the following is best as far as performance is concerned (not considering any environmental/health issues)?

1. Use non-ROHS solder with non-ROHS component;
2. Use non-ROHS solder with ROHS component;
3. Use ROHS solder with ROHS component;
4. Use ROHS solder with non-ROHS component.
1. (again, see google for "tin whiskers and RoHS"

Quote:
Originally posted by mtl777
Lastly, I still have lots of 60Sn/40Pb solder and would rather not switch to lead-free, but sometimes a component is available only as ROHS compliant. Is it OK to use this solder with ROHS compliant components or do I have to use lead-free?
Leaded solder is fine and preferred.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2008, 09:31 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
zapnspark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Midwest
I have also posted some RoHS information on this forum.
See:

http://tinyurl.com/28moed

ZAP
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th January 2008, 07:15 PM   #4
mtl777 is offline mtl777  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Great info! Thank you so much, guys. Now I know about tin whiskers and will avoid ROHS as much as possible!
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2008, 07:34 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Generally speaking, Tin/Lead non RoHS terminations are usually specified for military and space applications where long term stability and reliability are a must.
The general industry doesn't usually have such harsh requirements, and therefore are not so much bothered by the wisker effect on 100% tin plating.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The RoHS Fiasco zapnspark Everything Else 9 6th October 2007 04:36 PM
Lead-free, RoHS, etc. Nixie Parts 17 13th February 2007 02:58 AM
Tubes and RoHS compliance? alex278 Tubes / Valves 59 20th January 2006 12:47 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:27 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2