|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Are non-ROHS compliant components generally better performing than their ROHS compliant counterparts? Given the same component that is available as either ROHS or non-ROHS compliant, which one would you prefer to use (assuming your application does not require ROHS compliance)?
In particular, I am using lead-based 60/40 solder and am wondering if it is better to buy the non-ROHS compliant Chemicon KMG series capacitors for use with this type of solder than to buy the EKMG ROHS compliant version of the same series. What do you think? In general, if your application does not require ROHS compliance, which of the following is best as far as performance is concerned (not considering any environmental/health issues)? 1. Use non-ROHS solder with non-ROHS component; 2. Use non-ROHS solder with ROHS component; 3. Use ROHS solder with ROHS component; 4. Use ROHS solder with non-ROHS component. Lastly, I still have lots of 60Sn/40Pb solder and would rather not switch to lead-free, but sometimes a component is available only as ROHS compliant. Is it OK to use this solder with ROHS compliant components or do I have to use lead-free? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Midwest
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Great info! Thank you so much, guys.
and will avoid ROHS as much as possible!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Generally speaking, Tin/Lead non RoHS terminations are usually specified for military and space applications where long term stability and reliability are a must.
The general industry doesn't usually have such harsh requirements, and therefore are not so much bothered by the wisker effect on 100% tin plating. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The RoHS Fiasco | zapnspark | Everything Else | 9 | 6th October 2007 04:36 PM |
| Lead-free, RoHS, etc. | Nixie | Parts | 17 | 13th February 2007 02:58 AM |
| Tubes and RoHS compliance? | alex278 | Tubes / Valves | 59 | 20th January 2006 12:47 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08756 seconds (79.25% PHP - 20.75% MySQL) with 10 queries |