|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc. |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11th November 2007, 07:45 PM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
MJ21194 vs. MJ21196?
The spec's seem the same. The SOA is stated in datasheet as being higher on the x96 but the curves and numbers don't really corroborate.
The functionality curves are somewhat different, and to my uneducated eye, look more uniform/desirable on the x94 devices. The MJ21196's are cheaper. So, is there any general preference or advantage of one over the other for use as output transistors?  Any advice here? ..Todd |
|
|
30th November 2007, 03:47 AM
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
I will send an inqury to my On-Semi Reps and see what they have to say.
Should take but a couple of days to get a response. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mj21196 | d3imlay | Group Buys | 1 | 2nd December 2009 09:35 AM |
| FS On/Mot MJ21195/ MJ21196 | K-amps | Swap Meet | 4 | 21st October 2008 02:45 PM |
| Motorola MJ21194 MJ21193 MJ15023 high-power output transistors | rkc7 | Swap Meet | 4 | 31st December 2005 11:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06630 seconds (67.10% PHP - 32.90% MySQL) with 10 queries |
