Strange decoupling of op-amp power supplies - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Parts
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Parts Where to get, and how to make the best bits. PCB's, caps, transformers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th January 2003, 08:04 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Default Strange decoupling of op-amp power supplies

Hi all,

In my CDP (a heavily modified Rotel RCD955), I have noticed that the op-amp that controls the motor speed (NJM 4560) for the CDP transport has strange power supply decoupling:

The + and - 10V lines have no local decoupling at all (i.e. close to the op-amp) and in fact are connected to each other via a 220nF ceramic capacitor. I fail to see the sense of this ceramic capacitor!

Any idea as to why this configuration (i.e. the linking ceramic) is used and what it does?

I plan to remove the ceramic and install decoupling caps for each +-10V line to the opamp. Any comments? I think it should the supply to the op-amps.

Thanks for any help
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2003, 08:32 AM   #2
halojoy is offline halojoy  Sweden
On Hiatus
Join Date: Nov 2002
Default Possible

I think you say that the power supply rail
of the both OP amps are connected together by a ceramic cap.

I would guess that the two Opamps work work in anti-phase.
They can drive two opposite windings of the motor-coils.
So one output goes high, while the other goes negative.

In that case a postive spike on one supply rail
comes at same time as a negative on the other.

The ceramic than could a sort of cancel these spikes out.

This is what I can think of, by the little facts you have provided.
It does not have to be the correct reason
for that cap.
But as noone else have found anything better
for the moment - so I post this answer.

Best is if you could draw a simple diagram of the supplies.
Or give some additional information.

Of course I think that you can make a better supply for those
OPamps. The manufacturers make often very simple & cheap
solutions. They take the easy way.
And as long as it work well enough to satisfy the consumer,
they have a better profit margin and an simpler fabrication
of the machines.

/halo - might be right or might be wrong - in this case
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2003, 09:01 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Default Another idea?


Maybe additional information:

The njm 4560 is a dual op-amp. Pin 4 is the -10V input, pin 8 is the +10V input.

The - and + power supply lines that run into the op-amp (i.e at pin 4 and pin8) are connected via a ceramic cap (220nF).

Someone else suggested that maybe the arrangement allows for common mode noise on the + and -10V lines to be cancelled through the ceramic cap.

I think I will leave the ceramic cap in when I add the additional decoupling for the + and -10V lines.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2003, 09:20 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
jan.didden's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The great city of Turnhout, BE
Blog Entries: 8
Default strange

Doing that may couple supply (motor) noise to the ground tracks and into other parts of the circuitry. Unless you have a very good reason for this, I would be carefull and as a minimum do before-after listening tests.

Jan Didden
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2003, 09:38 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Default Reply to jan

Hi Jan and thanks,

In my Marantz CD 52, which shares the same transport electronics (i.e. TDA8808, 8809, TCA0372 and NJM4560x2), they have decoupled the supply lines to the NJM4560, whist not including the strange ceramic cap I refer to above.

I think I will try the decoupling and do the before-after listening.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2003, 04:50 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orleans, France
This is an explanation given by Douglas Self :

"The essential requirement is that the +ve and -ve rails should be decoupled with a 100nF capacitor between them, at a distance of not more than 2 inches. It is NOT necessary, and often NOT desirable to have two capacitors going to ground; every capacitor between a supply rail and ground carries the risk of injecting rail noise into the ground. "

Regards, PIerre Lacombe.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2003, 05:58 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Default No discernable difference

I have now removed the "strange ceramics" and used the standard methods of decoupling per line, i.e. 100uF tantalum/electrolytic in combination with a 100nF ceramic cap to ground on each of the +10V and -10V lines.

I cannot really discern a difference in sound after a preliminary 5 minutes of listening, although the bass registers may be ever so slightly more resolved. I've left the beast to run in and if anything does change, I'll report.

Thanks for the posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2003, 07:32 AM   #8
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
dhaen's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
Default Don't throw away those ceramics just because they're cheap.


Certain types of ceramic caps are actually uniquely good at decoupling.
This is due to the lossiness of the dielectric - exactly the reason why we dont use them for coupling

I would not remove these uniquely good decouplers.
They will be losing some of the unwanted energy as heat (tiny though it may be), rather than (de)coupling it to the nearest ground point, or the other supply rail.

  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Power Supply Decoupling rtarbell Power Supplies 43 12th April 2017 08:03 PM
Parallel a dual power supply or two power supplies? Thunau Power Supplies 12 16th February 2007 04:21 AM
tantalum caps in power supply/decoupling svokke Parts 8 23rd April 2003 12:30 PM
OSCONS better than BGs in all Power supply decoupling? PhopsonNY Parts 7 31st December 2002 02:38 PM
Power supply decoupling capacitors (beginner question) bm_mode Solid State 5 26th March 2002 01:29 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:45 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2