|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| PA Systems A forum for discussion of all parts of a sound reinforcement or DJ system: loudspeakers, mixers (desks) etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
I'm building a small PA system for when I DJ at house parties. I've made a pair of 12in bass bins and pair of 8in + tweeter mid/top cabs. I was planning on using a traditional 4th-order Linkwitz-Riley active crossover at 300Hz for the crossover between cabinets, but I'm wondering how a 4th-order LR for the high-pass and subtractive for the low-pass would fare. As I never thrash the system I reckon the stopband attenuation would not really be a problem.
Any comments on the sound subtractive vs traditional in this application?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
I don't know, so far I've just never got around to trying subtractive crossovers. If you do try them, I would be interested in your conclusions.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
richie00boy,
I played with MathCAD and plotted a two-way LR4 subtractive filter, see submitted picture. I recommend the use of Tolvan.com, Xdir for vertical polar dispersion evaluation of the filter. b 1(1) |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks bjorno. From your graph I pick out that the combined phase response is flat, this is to be expected from subtractive crossovers. The combined amplitude response I'm not sure is flat though, but maybe the bump at crossover will just give a bit of vocal projection, no bad thing really for a PA system. I've attached my simulated filter responses.
![]()
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
Quickly doing a screen measure, the bump is a mere 0.4 dB, not anythng to worry about.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
The bump is 4.2561dB @ 380.189Hz according to the marker. I'm not sure this is the right trade off for perfect phase response.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
That bump is not that severe. If phase is taken into account it's flat. The subtractive process occurs in real time, not values merely added together, as in the graph.
What you need to watch is the roll off on the bass channel. Its only about 6db/oct. That could be a problem with edge resonance of the bass driver. Regards, Geoff. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks Geoff that has helped. I did worry about the shallow roll-off on the bass as the graph showing the much steeper mid roll-off accentuates the problem.
The circuit is fairly simple so I might have a go and see how it turns out. After all a lot of PA systems run the bass driver fullrange or just with a passive crossover, at much higher frequency. The one I'm using has a foam roll surround so edge resonance might not be too badly damped.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Your welcome Richie00boy.
If you ever want to shift the xo on the subtractive filter, you only have one set of components to change. You can even make it switchable. I prefer simple passive xos if I must. But my favourite 15" with foam surround was a bit edgy about 750Hz on a 6db xo at 500. Geoff. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
I decided to check time domain amplitude response of 300Hz sine input vs the two outputs. The HF output is out by 180 degrees, surely this should be in phase at the crossover frequency?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GC with Active Subtractive XO | jackinnj | Chip Amps | 12 | 9th May 2008 09:05 AM |
| Active Subtractive XOs | phase_accurate | Multi-Way | 107 | 20th September 2007 06:17 AM |
| Electromechanical subtractive crossover? | Mr Evil | Multi-Way | 0 | 4th October 2004 11:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |