|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Optics Anything from lenses to polarizors |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Utah
|
Guys,
Correct me if I am wrong, But my understanding is that parabolic reflectors give off the best parallel light if the light source is small and located near the bottom of the reflector. But you would have to contain the front light cone either by filament design or by blocking it otherwise you have two main light paths. This is the problem with most illustrated examples is that they are only emphisizing one aspect of the light projection. Elliptical reflectors can be misleading because there are many shapes of elliptical. If you place a light source at one of the focal points of an elliptical reflector the reflected light will be directed at the second focal point. However if you place a small light source which is small in relation to the reflector near the bottom of an elliptical reflector it will be somewhat more parallel but not as much as a parabolic. A parabolic curve is defined by a specific mathmatic equation that shows common trends in statistical sampling. The closer the shape of an elliptical reflector is to a parabolic the more like the parabolic it will act if you set the light source up the same way. However it will not create parallel light as well as a perfectly made parabolic. Now, even with a parabolic you cannot get perfectly parallel light because in the real world you cannot get a perfect point source of light with the front light cone removed. One has to wonder though if you couldn't use a very small lens close to the light source to collumate the front light cone. And having it just the right diameter as to catch all of the light that missed the outer edges of the reflector. Assuming of course you want parallel light. This does mean that the condenser FL and diameter needs to be designed differently for complimenting the parallel light coming from the reflector. If you are working with the front light cone and treating the incoming light as a point source then dealing with the back and side reflected light becomes the issue. This is where the circular reflector comes in but one has to wonder if it is perfectly aligned if the light will be dispursed by hitting the filament again. This design seems to be the easiest to execute but one need a spherical light element for it to work at it's best. Since most light element are a piece of wire or a cylindrical piece of ceramic it would seem that in most cases the element is long and not a point. It almost seems like it would be better to lay the element horizontally in relation to the LCD and have a long filament as wide as the LCD and have a half cylindrical reflector and a cylindrical condenser lens because the light comming off from the ends of the light element is less and is further away from the point source. Maybe it should be disgarded. Hezz |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hezz i agree with you 100% and what you say is corect, all reflectors are made for a specific purpose, elipticals are made to make a second focal point to guide the most amount of light through the optics, also they cover more of the frontal light being radiated from the bulb to this point and i may add its also why its the most eficient reflector made to date. On your last statement with the arc being horizontal there are eliptical reflectors that alow the bulb to be placed at such angles for the bigger arced bulbs, its true what you say though no way can u get the perfect focal points with a arc thats big, im talking even 4mm is big, 1mm is ideal.
Trev |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
|
As Hezz write there are many shapes of elliptical reflectors. But I think you have missed the most important why to use a elliptical reflector. I hope my drawing clear this up. The biggest reason why they use elliptical reflectors in most searchlight, is that you can use more light from the front light cone, that will get lost in a parabolic reflector. The elliptical reflector is the most effective reflector you can use.
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
|
This is a picture from a professional light disco equipment, The Alchemist posted this before, this is a typical elliptical reflector. If you donīt beleave me that this type of reflectors is very common, go to the nearest hobby shop and look on some different searchlight-lamps, most of them will have a elliptical reflector.
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
mathias, i sujest you do abit more reading on this matter. The link that i posted earlier even states the eliptical reflector has 2 focal points and its the way they are used. The second focal guides the light through the optics in an non paralelle manner, also remember light going through a lens as hezz stated gets reflected back to its source, the ultimate in most cases is 45deg of angle at the lens surface. All of your answers are in here, it is now upto you to see where you are wrong.
Trev |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
As for the picture above, how do you know its a eliptical reflector? it doesnt say it is does it? it could be a parabolic with a light guide wich in turn in my eyes is what it looks like to me, or an eliptical with a light guide. Its strange how the radious from the back reflector has a bend to join to the front top half, so i would asume the top half is a light guide. No reflector will have any bend marks in it like the one above if it was all a eliptical reflector, so it has to be half a light guide. If this is a eliptical reflector it would have a long focal point, if its a parabolic well the obvious.
Trev |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I must agree with ace. An eliptical reflector has two focal points, that the nice thing of those refelectors because you don't need a condensor lens.
A parabolic reflector is not an eliptical one. Look at this article, very nice pic's. Ps. Ace did you looked at the topic on fresnell condesor distance. Do you understant the equations in my post?
__________________
Leeloo: Everything you create, you use to destroy. |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
|
I know that eliptical reflector has two focal points, but if you place the lightsource BEHIND the first focus, the light beams will NOT go to the second focus point, they will be more like a parallel beam, maybe you get a second focus point 200 meters away.
And the above picture is eliptical, isīt not bend in anyway itīs the reflection that make it look like that. I havenīt seen any picture yet that say I have wrong, all picture show the lightsource in the focuspoint, but that is not what i use. Why donīt anyone place the lightsource behind the focuspoint and then tellīs me what happens ? Have anyone actully seen what type of reflector they use in a normal searchlight ? |
|
|
|
|
#39 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
|
Hi Guy's,
I've had a long time away from the forum, and this thread caught my eye. If i might be so bold to say I agree with ACE, in that the best reflector to get parellel rays would be parobolic is shape. This is the one of the most important factors in another hobby of mine.... Astronomy. The newtonian telescope uses 2 mirrors to reflect the from distant start to a single point. this point is then magnifed with the use of an eyepiece to gain a image of the observed object. The light from these start in our own galaxy may have taveled up to 100,000 light years to reach us. This point of light can then be deemed to be at optical infinaty. thus the light rays are parellel So in our DIY projectors we are trying to get a parellel light from a point of light. It's a telescope in reverse, on a slightly smaller scale !! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.15230 seconds (75.69% PHP - 24.31% MySQL) with 11 queries |