Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Music
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Music A place to discuss the thing we are doing all this other stuff for

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th December 2006, 08:39 PM   #31
diyAudio Member
 
FastEddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Californie
" ... You might also like this discussion, about vinyl vs. digital: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/show...?threadid=91780 ..."

I know that vinyl can, under the right conditions and equipment mix, sound the best and have the most dynamic range ... but my experience, technically and listening wise, DVD-A comes as close to vinyl reproduction as modern A to D and D to A converters can manage.

" ... I read a review saying that XRCD is supposed to sound better than SACD! ..."

There is always some outfit trying to make the CD format better, but as the adages go, "garbage in = garbage out and you get no bread with one meatball"

You can't really improve on the basic 16-bit CD format. 16-bits is 16-bits = diminished headroom = reduced dynamics. This is root cause of Bob Dylan's complaints with Sony production engineers making a hashup of his latest CD ... overly compressed (in order to fit into the 16-bit CD format) leaving no dynamic headroom in relation to the studio 24-bit digital masters. The only way to reproduce 24-bit digital studio masters correctly is with a 24-bit reproduction format = 24-bit / 96k multi channel or 24-bit/192k encoded Dolby or THX (multi-channel) ... or vinyl.

As long as the musicians and studio engineers are using equipment like this to make the studio masters:

http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_u...1814-main.html
http://rolandus.com/products/product...2&ParentId=114
http://www.digitalaudio.dk/ax24.htm ... " The Dynamic range is between 118 & 121 dB and the Mic pre equivalent noise floor is at -130 dB. "

... the disc and record production should be as good the masters. Vinyl does this. easily. DVD-A does this, usually. SACD can do it, but seldom does. 16-bit CD can never reproduce 24-bit/96K stereo, let alone 24-bit/192k multi-channel (there just is not enough room on the CD disc for the full content ~= 10 pounds of content in a 2 pound bag = 5 gigabytes can't fit on a 1/2 gigabyte optical disc).

Music publishers are easily able to do either or both, CD and DVD-A without any increases in costs of manufacture ... and they could do both on the same disc (sideA = 24-bit DVD-A, sideB = 16-bit CD) with very little increase in production costs.

  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2006, 08:54 PM   #32
rdf is offline rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
rdf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
One thing to watch about DVD-A. As I understand it most releases come with surround tracks. I'm trying to find documented confirmation but I'm 99.99999% or more certain that surround formats uses a form of DSP based on the Head Related Transfer Function on the rear channels to create a more convincing impression of space. Similar to Q-Sound. When played back on any 2-channel player (I own in any case), those DSP'ed surround tracks are flat mixed back into the front channels. On movie surround tracks that's certainly the case, of the DVD-A discs I own my ear leads me to suspect the same.

End result, DVD-A playback over two channel systems potentially includes DSP-altered surround channels in the mix. That said, the best digital recordings I have are DVD-A. Also one of the worst (the Naxos Groff disc, shutter.) I would welcome a conversion to DVD-A.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2006, 10:03 PM   #33
diyAudio Member
 
FastEddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Californie
rdf: " ... about DVD-A ... I'm trying to find documented confirmation but I'm 99.99999% or more certain that surround formats uses a form of DSP based on the Head Related Transfer Function on the rear channels to create a more convincing impression of space. Similar to Q-Sound. ..."

Press Release: " ... Classic 24/192 DVD-A discs will be Universal DVD discs in the sense that they will be designed to play on both DVD Audio and DVD Video players. This will involve filling the audio title set with 24/192 data and the video title set with 24/96 data. These discs will therefore also play on universal players that support SACD and DVD Video. The transfers will be done using a specially designed battery powered 24/192 Analog to Digital converter designed by Kevin Halverson of Muse Electronics from original master tapes mastered ..." From: http://www.classicrecords.com/newsle...cfm?Article=94

Some record publishers, producers and reproducers actually try to duplicate the original studio masters in full DVD-A 24-bit/192k multichannel optical discs, seeking quality above all else ... without resorting to the mish mash of using the the various "quality" 16-bit compression and expansion (24 bit master to 16-bit CD digital back to "24-bit" DVD type disc). These mathamatical manipulations may seem like a good idea to cost cutting greedheads and middle management marketing types in the front offices of the likes of Sony, but they really will not cut it when the sophisticated customer discovers this ruse. Using big words to describe this outright fraud will not wash.

FYI to All: Sony and other major mass market publishers have been deliberately producing CD's with overly compressed content and distortion ... in order to make their (more expensive) SACD sound and DVD video tracks sound better. The most recent example is Bob Dylan's "Modern Times", available in two versions ( http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Times-B...dp/B000GFLAI0/ and http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Times-D.../dp/B000GRTQSE ). The mass market CD is overtly distorted and obviously sounds compressed, yet the same tracks on the video DVD are much better, the difference being chiefly that the CD (44k, overly compressed) content and DVD (48k content) WITH significant improvements and remixing by the Sony production engineers. Sony is trying to cut their share out of the middle of the pie, leaving Dylan with nothing left to do but to compalin to the clueless media. Fortunately Dylan owns the rights to his studio masters and soon there should be a 24-bit (hopefully DVD-A) release of this very interesting album ...

  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2006, 04:11 AM   #34
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Pink Floyd - Dark Side Of The Moon
180 Gram version, new.

This is the best sounding one. There are a couple of websites that still have it in stock, many are sold out. You think the Japanese one was nice? Grab this if you can, while you can!

Talk about imaging delight...

You can hear weird sounds that do circles in front of you and dance around then run away. There are people that run from right to left, while also going toward you and away from you. It is just a blast to listen too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th December 2006, 04:50 PM   #35
diyAudio Member
 
FastEddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Californie
rdf: " ... One thing to watch about DVD-A. As I understand it most releases come with surround tracks. ..."

check this out: " ... The transfers will be done using a specially designed battery powered 24/192 Analog to Digital converter ..." http://www.classicrecords.com/newsle...cfm?Article=88

... and these guys don't do "surround sound" or dolby unless the masters are made for such ... relying on the customers' equipment to add the various EQ / "expansion" or "decompression ... or not.

(I may have already submitted this link, but it should be repeated in any discussion about what some producers and reproducers do and others don't.)

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
test tracks for bass-heads OzMikeH Subwoofers 0 8th January 2008 04:56 AM
Old tracks came alive! davidlzimmer Chip Amps 1 18th February 2006 09:08 PM
Anyone experencing CDs with missing tracks? Christer Everything Else 12 20th January 2004 04:50 PM
NOS Dac noise when changing tracks carlosfm Digital Source 14 2nd October 2003 08:17 AM
Strengthening PCB tracks with solder? Cradle22 Solid State 11 14th March 2003 06:33 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:32 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 30.00%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio