What Do You Think of U2? - Page 3 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Music
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Music A place to discuss the thing we are doing all this other stuff for

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th December 2003, 02:44 PM   #21
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
I agree with Pedja -post # 13- : u2 becomes a really interesting rock band from ¨The Unforgettable Fire¨up.
Brian Eno is a great rock provocateur, I think.
Daniel Lanois... I think is a very talented songwriter an producer: Has anyone heard some of his solo work? : ¨Acadie¨ and ¨The Beauty of Wynona¨ -not Ryder- are just fantastic records...
I have recomended Lanois albums a lot here en Argentina. Aural Delicatessen.

I like a lot U2 records, except for -sometimes- the sound quality of some of the tracks. But I think is not ¨sound quality¨ the issue here. In 1993, Audio Magazine published an excellent interview with Brian Eno in which a lot was said about the distortions, effects, textures,recording philosophy, etc of U2 records, and it´s connection with Hi Fi: the final word was something like ...¨high end audio equipment is a very useful thing, because you can hear the distortion and effects better¨. Cool.

I believe that U2 broke down the eigthies cliché of pseudo new romantic hairdos singing in falsetto, or the regular MTV pop song standard plenty of synclaviers and electronic drumming. That was a good thing. And then, they became a very popular rock band with good songs and a somehow studied atittude: the sort of thing that generates ¨love them or hate them¨postures.
But I´m very grateful for the music that they crafted. And it became the soundtrack of interesting moments of my life.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2013, 01:03 AM   #22
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
U2 is one of my favourite bands of the 80s.....

I think I have THIER BEST CONCERT EVER on VHS: Under a blood red sky -- Done June 5th 1983 in Denver!!!!!!!!

It was freezing cold that day and they were OUTSIDE!! -- Im amazed the concert was so good in those conditions!!!!! (They almost cancelled the show)
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2013, 02:03 AM   #23
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
Pano's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SW Florida
Blog Entries: 4
U2? Pretty simple stuff. I think Bill Bailey sums it up best. See him here on YouTube
Bill Bailey - U2 Failure - Part Troll - YouTube
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2013, 02:31 AM   #24
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Buenos Aires
Strictly about music I found their latest works just boring; I fall asleep hearing to them.
I have about 95% of all their work in genuine CDs and been there at the Pop Mart tour which I loved and got me really impressed.

I'm one of those who like more their old stuff.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2013, 03:25 AM   #25
diyAudio Member
sakellogg's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: dixon ill
Originally Posted by whiteSE View Post
Personally, U2 bores me to death.....probably with some exception, most of their songs have the same backbeat, guitar sound.....I dont think they are very good at playing their instruments..and so it shows as a limit to what they can compose.

Just my humble opinion...
before it got old hat i liked some of their lp's

but to each his own. music is suposed to move you. if U2 moves you, spin as much as you can and enjoy.
I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2013, 09:55 AM   #26
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Birmingham, UK
I don't mind bands being a bit preachy at times but at least they should stick to what they preach about.
During the time artistic income was not taxed in Ireland U2 always went on about how immoral people/bands use tax havens and such but the moment they had to pay income tax in Ireland suddenly all their business went through a letter-box holding company in the Netherlands.

Practice what you preach or you are more of an a**hole than those who avoid tax without being preachy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2013, 10:37 AM   #27
davym is offline davym  Europe
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The bin
Are they making a comeback? this thread certainly has lol!

I preferred Simple Minds back in the day, still do.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2013, 12:03 PM   #28
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Bangladesh
Fixed audio/video here, most others of this video are off timed. .... U2 Where The Streets Have No Name Live At Slane Castle ...
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2013, 06:29 AM   #29
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Originally Posted by davym
Are they making a comeback?
I dunno but I just watched that concert again earlier....... MAN OH MAN DO I LOVE IT!! (Especially the song around 37 mins (But the whole thing kicks))

I wonder though WHY THEY KEPT SAYING "GOOD NIGHT" AT THE END OF EVERY SONG?? (After the first time it might have been a shock to have them quit so soon but after the 5th time its stupid )
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2013, 08:04 AM   #30
diyAudio Member
myglaren's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Not a U2 fan at all but thankful to them for coming up with this that the Junkies transformed into something wonderful.
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2