Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Music
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Music A place to discuss the thing we are doing all this other stuff for

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd May 2003, 03:25 AM   #81
diyAudio Member
 
Da5id4Vz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: lost in america...
Send a message via AIM to Da5id4Vz
So,

That guitar feedback at the beginning of "Revolution", nothing but wrong when it was recorded...

But then perhaps I'm one of the few here old enough to remember when it was released.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 03:42 AM   #82
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
Default Yeah, I'm Old Enough...

The intro on 'Holiday In Cambodia' (Dead Kennedys) is a major near bleeder on most systems.
On a really good system it sounds great, boring even.

Eric.
__________________
I believe not to believe in any fixed belief system.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 03:46 AM   #83
diyAudio Member
 
mikee12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NZ
Talking interesting..

i agree with steves interesting posts -

how we are all are on our own audio path -whether that is digital low distortion numbers-

or 'live'
or analog classic tube sound..
or whatever

Being 19years old,i hear crap on the radio,i grew up with it-
modern pop -mmm compression.

sometimes i listen to classical music,and am refreshed-
i like the dynamic range-even listening to concert FM on radio

i stil get out the DnB,hard dance and synth mp3s,(encoded at 190kpbs + ofcourse )


and then i listen to real acoustic music-
and i enjoy it i think as i age( i mean mature) i will appreciate more vocal,acoustic,real music

a very interesting thread.
SO many factors and variables and concepts in the whole audio experience.


my site
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 05:34 AM   #84
diyAudio Member
 
mrfeedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Perth, Australia.
Modern radio and recordings use multi-band compression, also caslled 'max loudness'.
This is the problem with what you are hearing.

Eric.
__________________
I believe not to believe in any fixed belief system.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 06:45 PM   #85
diyAudio Member
 
Da5id4Vz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: lost in america...
Send a message via AIM to Da5id4Vz
Default Art, Artiface, Money for Nothin...

Quote:
Modern radio and recordings use multi-band compression, also caslled 'max loudness'.
This is the problem with what you are hearing.
The Orban Optimod was for many years the tool of choice of many RF engineers for final grooming of the audio path for both FM and MTS television. As the name implies, it is also the modulator providing an IF output to the exciter or transmitter.

One of the many appeals of this product is that the settings can be physically locked preventing personnel who are not responsible for proper modulation of the RF carrier form tweaking them.

The engineer of course reports to the stations GM and has a dotted line connection to the program director. Depending on the station, and by this I mean most if not all commercial stations, the engineer will experience a great pressure to maintain a relative loudness "on the dial" with respect to their comparative broadcasters. Here lies nature of one evil audio beast.

Good recording engineers understand this and will often make pop recordings that account for this with astonishing results. Nine inch nails sounds great on FM, even better on CD and best live. But one factor that that has overwhelmingly influenced the sound of Trent Reznors work is the factor of relative loudness "on the dial".

Chances are Mr. Reznor wasn’t aware of all this when he was finding his voice. As an artist he was looking for a profitable place in the pop culture industry needing to deliver product in three (four counting music video) distinctively different media. The successful and talented artist will often follow a path of influence based on motivations from artists work and personal passions for what sounds right to them. A good producer and recording engineer will be quintessentially important in this process.

Take a look at the dynamic range of some of the old Queen recordings. This stuff was recorded so tight to peak that there was almost no dynamic range. And yet they are great sounding rock and roll that is almost impervious to the effects of both good and bad broadcast signal processing. The guys who engineered and mastered these recordings understood how to craft their product to respond to the total path of distribution under multiple media.

Band specific dynamics processing was something of the holly grail for me during my broadcasting days. I wanted it for tailoring weak voices in talent and for final processing before sending the program audio to satellite uplink (Optimod didn’t readily adapt to satellite exciters).

Latter I looked high and low (I guess that a sort of band specific pun) for band specific dynamics in either a DAW feature or on an outboard box for postproduction audio applications. As I ran screaming from my career in professional audio these platforms were really just becoming available.

I'm not to sure how often this feature is used in recording today although I’m sure that it has been a prevalent influence in broadcasting since the mid to late 70's.

Perhaps Dee Schneider is a dummy. Wish I made as much money as he did. I went to college with some people who talked about having Twisted Sister play at their senior prom. It was before they hit MTV but they were reported to be every bit as freaky. Here is an act that made some decent money and had a little fun in the process. Their greatest failure may have been in not creating a genre for themselves that could evolve to a higher art or to continually meet the tastes of the pop culture consuming public. This is not an uncommon occurrence in the music industry, most often attributed to legendary hubris, ego, and personal abuse from controlled substances.

An analogy that I’ve often used is that money, combined with media is like rancid meat, they both attract maggots. The allure of sex, wealth, power and fame does not attract pure art. It has however acted as an incredible motivator for young and hungry souls to become artists. I once asked a musician friend from Cleveland what the origin of "the Akron Sound" was. He reported it to be a unique combination of middle class sensibilities where kids had access to instruments and training while growing up in an age of knowing that rock and roll (or funk) could lead them to a path of fame and fortune. Some of them found art along the way. Others found careers doing other things.

Of course art for arts sake is just another form of self-indulgence. Art that shares something common in the human experience is what others can find relative.

Perhaps what the issue with this years young new performers is that they are expecting too much from an audience that expects little more than a flashy video.

My humble opinions.

-Dave

(Long conference calls are great for support DIYaudio addictions)
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 07:38 PM   #86
diyAudio Member
 
nobody special's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Quote:
I once asked a musician friend from Cleveland what the origin of "the Akron Sound" was.
Well, since I grew up in a suburb of Akron (Stow) and have most of my experience with bands in the Akron/Cleveland/Youngstown area, I am kind of confused as to what the "Akron Sound" is... Could you describe what you mean? From what I've heard around here, it's probably the bar band sound. You know, Lynard Skynard wannabee bands ("Let's hear some free bird!")
Good post, btw.
__________________
Nobody
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 08:06 PM   #87
diyAudio Member
 
Da5id4Vz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: lost in america...
Send a message via AIM to Da5id4Vz
Ive come to think of the Akron Sound, as the bands that came out of the area in the late 70's early 80' like Devo, the Pretenders or Rick Nielson and of course Don Was. Not sure that that’s what constitutes a genre, but nonetheless I’ve always been impressed that so many came form the area around the same time. Its also very likely that Ive exaggerated my geography a little to include some of these artists.

I grew up in Buffalo. I can only think of Rick James, Grover Washington and the Goo Goo Dolls as being famous pop artists from the area. Certainly too diverse and chronologicly spread out to define a "Buffalo Sound" genre.

A couple of different musicians from the Akron area tell me stories of doing sessions for Bootsy Collins and George Clinton, but I think they a really more Cleveland and Cincinnati.

Regardless of the geography, there was still a motivation of hunger (financial, emotional or artistic) within an ethic of hard work that created a lot of second and third generation Rock and Roll.


-Dave

Of course I make no great clames to expertese with most of the material I post here. I just enjoy trying to share interesting ideas with interesting poeple.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 08:11 PM   #88
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Default BUFFALO BILL.

Hi,

Aren't "The Pretenders" a British band?
Or maybe there's more than one?

I'm reffering to Chrissie Hynde's group.

Cheers,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 08:17 PM   #89
diyAudio Member
 
Da5id4Vz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: lost in america...
Send a message via AIM to Da5id4Vz
Hey my confrence call is over.

I need to go do some REEL work. I agree she sounds British, as do a lot of American rock and roll folks, But I did just google this:

http://www.infoplease.com/ipea/A0771192.html
singer
Born: 9/7/1951
Birthplace: Akron, Ohio

Chrissie Hynde has served as songwriter, guitarist, and lead singer of the Pretenders, the band she helped to found in 1978
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2003, 08:18 PM   #90
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

My mistake then....sorry.
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why do many recordings sound so bad? keyser Music 7 24th April 2005 04:22 AM
MP3 encoding makes marginal recordings sound better? Circlotron Everything Else 8 8th February 2005 01:36 AM
what the crap is this!? xdissent Tubes / Valves 4 14th March 2004 12:40 AM
TO3 transistors sound crap ? Bernhard Solid State 4 18th March 2003 03:38 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:03 PM.

Page generated in 0.15378 seconds (74.12% PHP - 25.88% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio