|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: basque country
|
Has anybody experienced a more prominent treble content in the overall sound when converting a tweeter crossover from first order high pass to second order (by adding a 0.2 coil in parallel after the 2.2 series capacitor) ?
If so, could you explain how this might happen? Perhaps the brain notices the highest frequencies more because there is now a greater dip between them and the mid-woofer´s output? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Possibly now you have a high-Q tweeter response. How did you design your crossover?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: basque country
|
Thanks for your pront response.
I´m using a foster ribbon tweeter. This is my first diy speaker and started with a capacitor in series because it´s the simplest. I have no previous x-over design knowledge-other than what I´ve gleaned from this forum. I was hearing some harsh strings in symphonic music which I wanted to smooth out while retaining the very high frequency details. ( I listen to SACD mostly). A series resistor did not achieve both goals. The coil did. And as I said, hearing the subjective stronger treble presence has baffled me. Does a higher Q mean a narrower peak in the response? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
It means the response peaks up before the roll-off region. 2nd-order and higher filters can peak in this way if not designed properly.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: basque country
|
So the output at a particular frequency point is actually stronger than before. That sure explains what I am hearing. Most interesting. Thanks for clarifying.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1st order Passive Line Level Crossover + 2nd order Highpass? | alexclaber | Multi-Way | 11 | 4th January 2008 07:15 PM |
| My 1st order butterworth filter better than 4th order L-R: Why? | philipreji | Solid State | 61 | 1st March 2007 04:50 PM |
| 2nd Order Tweeter + 3rd Order Woofer = OK? | Jay | Multi-Way | 3 | 12th September 2005 12:12 PM |
| 1st Order Tweeter, 3rd Order Woofer? | Jay | Multi-Way | 8 | 8th May 2004 09:29 PM |
| 1st order ? L-R 2nd order? or transient perfect?? | Ken L | Multi-Way | 6 | 17th October 2003 04:22 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |