Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th March 2007, 11:28 AM   #1
irb is offline irb  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Glasgow
Default Protecting tweeters while testing

When measuring the frequency response of a tweeter with a computer based measuring system, (e.g. Soundeasy, LSPCad) what is advisable in terms of tweeter protection?

Ian
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 11:49 AM   #2
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
Run at quiet levels and include an active high-pass filter. Then you add the filter response to the measured response to end up with the overall curve. Obviously this will only be good for maybe 20dB down the filter slope, but that should be more than far enough to investigate.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 08:06 PM   #3
dlr is offline dlr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canton, MA
Default Re: Protecting tweeters while testing

Quote:
Originally posted by irb
When measuring the frequency response of a tweeter with a computer based measuring system, (e.g. Soundeasy, LSPCad) what is advisable in terms of tweeter protection?

Ian
If you are measuring in 2-channel mode (recommended) and using an MLS test signal, you have two options. You can measure at low levels with no protection. That's all I've ever done, but you do run the risk of tweeter damage if there's a problem or if you over-drive the tweeter. Higher power levels can be useful because that improves the S/N ratio.

The other method is to use a series cap, though I've never done this myself. If you use a cap, all you need to do is ensure that the probe is connected after the cap, that is, on the tweeter input lead. The probe eliminates all upstream influence, preamp, power amp, capacitor, conductors, etc. There's no need to include the cap in any model. This will also let you more safely increase the power level. There will still be some decreased S/N in the rolloff area from the cap, but at least it's still protected. It's also not usually that much of an issue with tweeter SPL measurements.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2007, 09:16 PM   #4
irb is offline irb  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Glasgow
Thanks to both of you! This is very helpful.

Ian
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple DIYable Waveguide testing (dome tweeters) dlneubec Multi-Way 3 14th October 2008 04:10 PM
why is my amp protecting? mbugua Class D 2 19th January 2007 12:58 PM
protecting mosfets in UcD zilog Class D 10 12th November 2006 07:52 PM
FS Accuton C2-22 tweeters, pair, used for 5 mins of testing Mark Hathaway Swap Meet 0 1st March 2004 03:26 AM
protecting my speakers from my GC damitamit Chip Amps 13 16th June 2003 03:46 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:31 PM.

Page generated in 0.08367 seconds (72.64% PHP - 27.36% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio