Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th March 2007, 03:00 AM   #1
taj is offline taj
diyAudio Member
 
taj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Default SoundEasy Jig - Will it fly?

I just bought SoundEasy, and decided to make up a jig so I can leave my wiring intact and twiddle switches instead. So here's what I came up with (with the help of other jigs and probes I've seen floating around.)

Lift times thrust is greater than weight times drag. But will it fly? Comments? Revisions needed?

..Todd
Attached Images
File Type: gif soundeasy-jig.gif (18.5 KB, 638 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 03:21 AM   #2
Account disabled at member's request
 
MJL21193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
No.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 04:42 AM   #3
taj is offline taj
diyAudio Member
 
taj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Hmm... Maybe you weren't folding it correctly. This is the best way... <see picture>


What about electrically. Will it work for SoundEasy?

..Todd
Attached Images
File Type: jpg b2.jpg (5.1 KB, 445 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 06:48 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
janneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium meet
Blog Entries: 6
Default Re: SoundEasy Jig - Will it fly?

Quote:
Originally posted by taj
I just bought SoundEasy, and decided to make up a jig so I can leave my wiring intact and twiddle switches instead. So here's what I came up with (with the help of other jigs and probes I've seen floating around.)

Lift times thrust is greater than weight times drag. But will it fly? Comments? Revisions needed?

..Todd
Looks OK to me. Nice touch to also switch input terminations.

Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 09:17 AM   #5
Shaun is offline Shaun  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
It will work, but not as well as the original probe concept. I have been down this path. It's basically the Wallin Jig approach. But SE uses "local sensing" approach, with probes best connected directly to the load and sensing resistor. Speaker Workshop (for which the Wallin jig was built) has a nifty calibration procedure that compensates for lead losses, but SE does not use this scheme.

I still use the box that I had designed for a "SE jig", but it has been de-tuned such that it now only switches between impedance measurement and acoustic measurement. I have also included a switch to switch in a series capacitor for protecting tweeters when doing SPL measurements. Also, my box still accepts connections for the probes, connections to the soundcard and the amplifier outputs. But the sensing resistor (for impedance measure) is external now, as are the reference resistors, inductor and capacitor I use for checking setup (they are all loose). This has yielded the most consistent results for me.

OK. Long story short: the jig is a good idea for convenience (a hub if you will), but the sensing resistor should be external and used as per the SE diagrams.
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht
|||||||||| DON'T PANIC ||||||||||
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 12:02 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indiana
FWIW, here is the one I use with SE.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf measurement jig connections-rev2.pdf (75.9 KB, 298 views)
__________________
Dan N.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 02:59 PM   #7
taj is offline taj
diyAudio Member
 
taj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Quote:
Originally posted by Shaun

OK. Long story short: the jig is a good idea for convenience (a hub if you will), but the sensing resistor should be external and used as per the SE diagrams.

Excellent response. Thanks Shawn. Bypassing the series load resistor with the "load" switch will allow me to use one nearer the speaker (or not if I'm feeling particularly lazy) so it's still usable as is.

Quote:

I have also included a switch to switch in a series capacitor for protecting tweeters when doing SPL measurements.
Me too.

Quote:

Nice touch to also switch input terminations.
Thanks Jan.

Quote:
FWIW, here is the one I use with SE.
Thanks dlneubec, looks pretty similar.

..Todd
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 03:03 PM   #8
taj is offline taj
diyAudio Member
 
taj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Next Question...

How big does the 'sensing' resistor need to be in terms of power dissipation? 10 watts?

And what about the voltage divider resistors? 1/4 watt or 1 watt?

..Todd
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 03:33 PM   #9
taj is offline taj
diyAudio Member
 
taj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Quote:
Originally posted by Shaun
It will work, but not as well as the original probe concept. SE uses "local sensing" approach, with probes best connected directly to the load and sensing resistor.
Another thought... Using this 'box' with shorter leads to the DUT (say 10-20 cm or so) would probably help here wouldn't it?

..Todd
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 06:23 AM   #10
Shaun is offline Shaun  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Quote:
Originally posted by taj
Next Question...

How big does the 'sensing' resistor need to be in terms of power dissipation? 10 watts?

And what about the voltage divider resistors? 1/4 watt or 1 watt?

..Todd
It can be as small as 1/4W, perhaps even 1/8W. But I favour larger resistors for the bulk. They're tougher physically and less fiddly.

Quote:
Originally posted by taj


Another thought... Using this 'box' with shorter leads to the DUT (say 10-20 cm or so) would probably help here wouldn't it?

..Todd
IME it's not the lead resistance per se that's the problem, but contact resistance. I use crocodile clips, and usually give them just a bit of a tweak after clipping on to ensure proper contact. My "signal" leads are all of 1.25m long, while the "sense" leads are probably similar in length.


EDIT: Avoid wire-wound resistors. They are inductive, usually. Metal Film is good.
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht
|||||||||| DON'T PANIC ||||||||||
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: Soundeasy Ang Swap Meet 5 18th December 2008 12:53 AM
SoundEasy V14 FS idoru97214 Swap Meet 4 17th October 2007 05:11 PM
FS: SoundEasy 10 alexcd Swap Meet 3 18th June 2007 02:43 PM
Soundeasy v12 USB for sale tkelley Swap Meet 0 16th November 2006 07:29 PM
For Sale: SoundEasy 10 MtBiker Swap Meet 4 9th October 2006 12:53 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:31 PM.

Page generated in 0.11802 seconds (80.04% PHP - 19.96% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio