|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Are there any rules of thumb - especially around the 0.5 woofer when designing a TMM 2.5 way?
For example: - Use the same model driver for both 1.0 and 0.5 woofers - Placement on baffle (or even rear of cabinet?) - Design so that the high pass rolloff begins at the bafflestep frequency - physical proximity to 1.0 woofer (if on front baffle) - ie. should it be right below or can it be closer to the floor to even out midbass dips etc... ... the one I am really interested in... - any rule of thumb about the 0.5 woofer should be X dB down at frequency Y so as to not interfere with a) crossover phase tracking / midrange clarity? The reason I am looking toward a TMM design is: a) simpler to design a crossover (?) than a full 3 way design with 3 different driver b) more cone area to drive bass for a larger room (I find I overdrive TMs in my living room) c) Avoid vertical lobing issues with an MTM Thanks, David. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
Some quick answers.
Use the same woofer for the 0.5. On the rear works extremely well but you need a lot of space to the back wall (>1m). On the front also works well and within 1 wavelength of the xo frequency but for the low xo, never a prob. I tend to put the 0.5 just above or below the box centre. I've found from the ones I've done, the best xo for the 0.5 is about a third of the BS frequency... so BS at 600Hz would have 0.5 xo at 200Hz. This tends to have minimal effect on the mids and only supplies what goes missing with BS. I found higher xo frequencies alter the tonal balance too much for my tastes. Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Thanks rabbitz.
I am most concerned about the 0.5 top end rolloff being too shallow or too high up in Hz to then muddy the midrange. (My current design seems to put the 0.5 at least 60 degrees out of phase with the 1.0 woofer). I'll try lowering the 0.5 rolloff to around 1/3rd BS freq as you suggest. Of course - that might mean the mid/woofers I intend on using aren't any good for a TMM... might have to keep looking. Cheers, David. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bass Guitar: Using a thumb? | pitsburg_hippie | Instruments and Amps | 4 | 12th December 2006 07:43 PM |
| Rule of Thumb on 3 way driver SPL's. | 2litre | Multi-Way | 4 | 15th September 2005 08:21 AM |
| Bias Rules of Thumb?? | Zero Cool | Solid State | 15 | 17th February 2005 10:08 PM |
| No. of parallel BJT? Rule of thumb? | sam9 | Solid State | 4 | 26th April 2004 10:48 PM |
| Are there rules of thumb for inrush current? | leadbelly | Parts | 8 | 26th February 2004 01:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06907 seconds (77.13% PHP - 22.87% MySQL) with 10 queries |