
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  diyAudio Store  Blogs  Gallery  Wiki  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
MultiWay Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
13th January 2003, 03:30 AM  #1 
diyAudio Member

isosceles tetrahedron formula
Would someone like to suggest one of the following:
A formula for determining the volume of an isosceles tetrahedron, NOT the formula for determining the volume of a regular tetrahedron NOR for the irregular nonisosceles? A calculator or modeler of some sort that will do it graphically? A website that has the actual formula spelled out? Or solve this problem: The outside measurements of a 3/4" thick wood base are equilaterally 21". What are the measurements of the 3 isosceles triangles which will give the resulting tetrahedron 1.5 cubic feet (don't neglect the wood thickness)? Show your work so I can steal the formula. Much appreciated. Dave 
13th January 2003, 04:36 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cambridge, MA

Thread
So let me get this straight,
The isosceles tetrahedron has an equilateral triangle as a base, with edge length of 21"? If that's the case then the isosceles triangles should have one edge at 21" and the isosceles edges at 63.325" I just used a ProE model and changed the height of the tetrahedron until the enclosed volume was the right value, this does incorporate the thickness of the box. I'm sure there's some formula out there you could modify, but since you're doing it an odd way you might need to do some sort of iterative solution anyhow. 
13th January 2003, 04:41 AM  #3  
frugalphile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator

Re: isosceles tetrahedron formula
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites tlinespeakers.org, frugalhorn.com, frugalphile.com ........ commercial site planet10HiFi p10hifi forum here at diyA 

13th January 2003, 06:02 AM  #4 
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan

The area of an equilateral triangle is A = 0.433 * X^2.
In this case x = 21 => A = 190.95sq.in. The volume would be 0.433 * (the integral of X^2) from 0 to h, where h = height of the isosceles tetrahedron. The desired volume is (V) = 1.5cu.ft. = 1728 * 1.5 = 2592cu.in. Solving for h above => 2592 = 0.433 * (h^3/3) => h^3 = 17958.43 => h = 26.187in. This is the height of the isosceles tetrahedron By trig, the edge of each side is 28.857in. and 21in. at the base. Rodd Yamashita 
13th January 2003, 01:19 PM  #5  
diyAudio Member

Re: Re: isosceles tetrahedron formula
Thanks all, but see the bottom of this post because I got two quite different answers. BTW, Here's why I asked in the first place: http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/for...trahedron.html Upon seeing this, my eyes glazed over.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Dave 

13th January 2003, 02:34 PM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cambridge, MA

Discrepancy
I think the difference is I account for a box in my calculations. The 1.5 cubic feet is the volume inside the box, and the 21" edge length and 63" edge length are the outside edge lengths of the box.
Using the dimensions of the inside tetrahedron (the dimensions of the volume) with edge lengths 18.14" and 55.57" I doublechecked with the matrix formula and my answer is correct unless there's some other mistake. 1.0e+003 * 0 0.3291 0.3291 3.0880 0.0010 0.3291 0 0.3291 3.0880 0.0010 0.3291 0.3291 0 3.0880 0.0010 3.0880 3.0880 3.0880 0 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0 The determinant of that matrix is 1.9350e+009 1.9350e+009 = 288 * V^2 Therefore V = 2.5920e+003 in^3 = 1.5 ft^3 
13th January 2003, 03:18 PM  #7  
diyAudio Member

Re: Discrepancy
Quote:
5 ft 3 in? I've got to work on my sales technique to the wifey before I start construction on these mamas. Thanks tons, Dave PSdo you know where the two different calculations are off? Even if Roddyama didn't take into account the inside of the box, his is still much different than yours. 

13th January 2003, 04:15 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cambridge, MA

The differences most likely resulted from a couple of things:
Using 21" edge length instead of 18.14" for the base Not accounting for the box itself. They probably aren't off as much as they look, the truth of the matter is a tall tetrahedron isn't a very efficient way of holding volume. 
13th January 2003, 05:49 PM  #9 
diyAudio Member

Well, thanks to yours and roddyama's supplied calculations, I can achieve a shorter and broader tetrahedron. In addition, 1.5 cu ft was the absolute maximum for the driver in question. It will still sound good (given a skillful construction) with much less volume. I'll advise as things progress.
Keep a lookout for "tetrahedron DIY project finished" in the next few weeks, and I'll be sure to post photos and credits. Thanks Dave 
13th January 2003, 06:44 PM  #10  
frugalphile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator

Re: Re: Discrepancy
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites tlinespeakers.org, frugalhorn.com, frugalphile.com ........ commercial site planet10HiFi p10hifi forum here at diyA 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Isosceles ( A speaker project)  ttruman  MultiWay  27  8th March 2008 12:08 AM 
Q formula  PeteMcK  MultiWay  10  17th January 2008 08:42 PM 
Line Array Isosceles Trapezoid Question  dc270  MultiWay  5  3rd February 2006 07:25 AM 
Tetrahedron output stage topology.  Circlotron  Solid State  25  3rd February 2005 11:19 AM 
Anyone have the formula for...  Rino odorico  MultiWay  4  22nd January 2003 05:07 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 