isosceles tetrahedron formula
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 13th January 2003, 02:30 AM #1 kneadle   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Buffalo, NY isosceles tetrahedron formula Would someone like to suggest one of the following: A formula for determining the volume of an isosceles tetrahedron, NOT the formula for determining the volume of a regular tetrahedron NOR for the irregular non-isosceles? A calculator or modeler of some sort that will do it graphically? A website that has the actual formula spelled out? Or solve this problem: The outside measurements of a 3/4" thick wood base are equilaterally 21". What are the measurements of the 3 isosceles triangles which will give the resulting tetrahedron 1.5 cubic feet (don't neglect the wood thickness)? Show your work so I can steal the formula. Much appreciated. Dave
 13th January 2003, 03:36 AM #2 MITMechE diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2002 Location: Cambridge, MA Thread So let me get this straight, The isosceles tetrahedron has an equilateral triangle as a base, with edge length of 21"? If that's the case then the isosceles triangles should have one edge at 21" and the isosceles edges at 63.325" I just used a ProE model and changed the height of the tetrahedron until the enclosed volume was the right value, this does incorporate the thickness of the box. I'm sure there's some formula out there you could modify, but since you're doing it an odd way you might need to do some sort of iterative solution anyhow.
planet10
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Re: isosceles tetrahedron formula

Quote:
 Originally posted by kneadle A website that has the actual formula spelled out?
IIRC the volume of any regular solid like this should be 1/6 x the area of the base x the height.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA

 13th January 2003, 05:02 AM #4 roddyama   diyAudio Moderator Emeritus     Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Michigan The area of an equilateral triangle is A = 0.433 * X^2. In this case x = 21 => A = 190.95sq.in. The volume would be 0.433 * (the integral of X^2) from 0 to h, where h = height of the isosceles tetrahedron. The desired volume is (V) = 1.5cu.ft. = 1728 * 1.5 = 2592cu.in. Solving for h above => 2592 = 0.433 * (h^3/3) => h^3 = 17958.43 => h = 26.187in. This is the height of the isosceles tetrahedron By trig, the edge of each side is 28.857in. and 21in. at the base. Rodd Yamashita
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Buffalo, NY
Re: Re: isosceles tetrahedron formula

Thanks all, but see the bottom of this post because I got two quite different answers. BTW, Here's why I asked in the first place: http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/for...trahedron.html Upon seeing this, my eyes glazed over.

Quote:
 Originally posted by planet10 IIRC the volume of any regular solid like this should be 1/6 x the area of the base x the height. dave
I don't think an isosceles tetrahedron is a regular solid. If it is, then I have never seen it described as such. You can see by Roddyama's response above that it is a little more complicated than solving for a regular solid.

Quote:
 Originally posted by MITMechE If that's the case then the isosceles triangles should have one edge at 21" and the isosceles edges at 63.325"
Quote:
 Originally posted by roddyama By trig, the edge of each side is 28.857in. and 21in. at the base.
Ok. Do you two guys wanna wrestle for it?

Dave

 13th January 2003, 01:34 PM #6 MITMechE diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2002 Location: Cambridge, MA Discrepancy I think the difference is I account for a box in my calculations. The 1.5 cubic feet is the volume inside the box, and the 21" edge length and 63" edge length are the outside edge lengths of the box. Using the dimensions of the inside tetrahedron (the dimensions of the volume) with edge lengths 18.14" and 55.57" I double-checked with the matrix formula and my answer is correct unless there's some other mistake. 1.0e+003 * 0 0.3291 0.3291 3.0880 0.0010 0.3291 0 0.3291 3.0880 0.0010 0.3291 0.3291 0 3.0880 0.0010 3.0880 3.0880 3.0880 0 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0 The determinant of that matrix is 1.9350e+009 1.9350e+009 = 288 * V^2 Therefore V = 2.5920e+003 in^3 = 1.5 ft^3
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Buffalo, NY
Re: Discrepancy

Quote:
 Originally posted by MITMechE I think the difference is I account for a box in my calculations. The 1.5 cubic feet is the volume inside the box, and the 21" edge length and 63" edge length are the outside edge lengths of the box.
...and I was worried that I wouldn't have room to properly port the box!

5 ft 3 in? I've got to work on my sales technique to the wifey before I start construction on these mamas.

Thanks tons,

Dave

PS--do you know where the two different calculations are off? Even if Roddyama didn't take into account the inside of the box, his is still much different than yours.

 13th January 2003, 03:15 PM #8 MITMechE diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2002 Location: Cambridge, MA The differences most likely resulted from a couple of things: Using 21" edge length instead of 18.14" for the base Not accounting for the box itself. They probably aren't off as much as they look, the truth of the matter is a tall tetrahedron isn't a very efficient way of holding volume.
 13th January 2003, 04:49 PM #9 kneadle   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Buffalo, NY Well, thanks to yours and roddyama's supplied calculations, I can achieve a shorter and broader tetrahedron. In addition, 1.5 cu ft was the absolute maximum for the driver in question. It will still sound good (given a skillful construction) with much less volume. I'll advise as things progress. Keep a lookout for "tetrahedron DIY project finished" in the next few weeks, and I'll be sure to post photos and credits. Thanks Dave
planet10
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Re: Re: Discrepancy

Quote:
 Originally posted by kneadle Dave PS--do you know where the two different calculations are off? Even if Roddyama didn't take into account the inside of the box, his is still much different than yours.
Mine was a guess pulled from my head (from info stored there a long time ago). If Rod solved the integral correctly then i probably just mis-remembered. Maybe the 1/6 should be 1/3?

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Holton Precision Audio         CSS         Dx Classic Amplifiers         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ttruman Multi-Way 27 7th March 2008 11:08 PM PeteMcK Multi-Way 10 17th January 2008 07:42 PM dc270 Multi-Way 5 3rd February 2006 06:25 AM Circlotron Solid State 25 3rd February 2005 10:19 AM Rino odorico Multi-Way 4 22nd January 2003 04:07 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:54 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.