|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
I'm building vented speakers with a rectangular vented port. The port is a part of the walls cabinet (it uses 3 walls of the cabinet, the fourth side must be adjusted at the port length needed).
Of course I can use some dedicated software in order to calculate (estimate) the port length. But, for my intellectual curiosity, I would like to know how to calculate or estimate the end correction of such a vented port. I can find some rules in the bibliography, but it's always for a round port. Nothing is clear for rectangular port. And it's less clear for a port using walls cabinet. Can somebody be abble to provide me some informations ? Many thanks in advance. Philippe. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
I am afraid if you are trying a special situation, it is cut and try. There are some rules of thumb out there, like subtract half the height of the slot when using a cabinet wall, but I am afraid the best method is to make it too long to begin with, then measure and adjust. There is nothing really wrong with a port tuned too low, they only become a problem when tuned too high...
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
That is my feeling too, and this is sort of problematic because rectangular ports are typically more integrated with the box design, making the length harder to adjust.
The end correction for circular tubes comes from the radiation impedance of a baffled piston, and I could imagine that it would be possible to find an analytical expression for the radiation impedance of an infinitely long bar. Has anyone seen such an expression? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
OK, then what is all the end correction math all about? GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Yes very interesting.
But is the end correction formula only for one side of the port ? In this case, the correct value should be the double. In the paper it's write than the expression is for a rectangular duct ended with an infinite baffle. But in a loudspeaker enclosure, on side of the port is ended with a baffle, but the other side has an unflanged opening (or quite because of the walls of the cabinet on 3 sides). |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NNW of Rome
|
... maybe this is what you are looking for
Its good for a first calculation but measurements with LIMP are much more reliable --> http://www.fesb.hr/~mateljan/arta/download.htm Regards Heinrich |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Great ! Many thanks !
But by what K should be multiplied ? For a cylindric port, 0.732 is the coefficient for the diameter. But for another shape, is it the equivalent diameter that we have to use ? I have already LIMP. It's a very convinient software. You are right, the calculation is for a first estmation. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Narrow, shallow rectangular port | cabbagerat | Full Range | 7 | 14th February 2008 10:03 AM |
| Port question, round vs rectangular | kvk | Full Range | 6 | 11th February 2008 08:16 AM |
| What is c in the port length formula? | Jay | Multi-Way | 2 | 27th February 2007 10:23 AM |
| MJK worksheets – rectangular port help | sunil | Multi-Way | 3 | 5th February 2005 08:58 PM |
| rectangular port questions | Jimmy154 | Multi-Way | 8 | 30th June 2002 08:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10947 seconds (79.16% PHP - 20.84% MySQL) with 10 queries |