The "Elsinore Project" Thread
Thought it best to consolidate the inquiries re the Elsinore Project into a single thread, so issues can be dealt here.
Let's get the ball rolling with PoorSound earlier inquiry.
You can still use the 6.5" HDS PPB but my preference in Mk2 uses the Nomex 830875 and, yep, you guessed it, Peerless HDS Tweeter. Not the older HDS but the newer 810921.
The crossovers only has resistor value changes to 6.5" drivers, but has a different hi-pass to the tweeter; same component layout but quite different values. It also includes a conjugate filter that not only flattens the large Z peak around 1KHz down to about 12 Ohm as well as greatly reducing the negative phase angle (electrical) caused by the tweeter's main coupling cap just below the crossover.
The Nomex version is also about 1dB more sensitive, is now a genuine 8 Ohm design and is largely within 6-12 Ohm above 100Hz. The system was modeled with amplifier output impedances as high as 3 Ohm, so SETs and zero-feedback tube PPs will have no problems and the amplitude (frequency) response is hardly modulated by the output Z.
This afternoon we heard the Reference 3a Veena speaker at Audiophile Society of NSW. The Veena is rated 89dB but the Elsinore was judged about 3dB more sensitive. This latest version is VERY easy to drive for a multi-way type speaker.
The new Peerless HDS tweeter is, IMO, a real honey. I hope the DIY fraternity takes it to heart. It is quite an improvement on the Vifa XT25. If any of you guys are considering using it, go for it! I have issues with the more expensive Scan-Speak/Revelator tweeters and I am not the only one. There are some published distortion figure I am sure others have seen, like Zaph's. The new HDS tweeter not only measures low distortion, it sounds that way.
I intend to do some distortion measurements of my own and compare it to other tweeters I have here including XT25.
Re movies: Build four of these and... whew! The SPL capability would be awesome. No need for subs, trust me, they have quite a wallop in the bottom. Modest power of 35W/ch in my room and a single pair are capable of concert level with ease, now four? Whoa!
Please note that the Elsinore Project is just that, a project. I can apologise for the changes being made, but hopefully you can see how things can go awry as things are in a state of flux. But with the Mk2 things should settle down.
The website needs to be updated and will be asap. The Mk1 still works absolutely OK, but Mk2 uses a better tweeter, is also more suitable for tubes whereas Mk1 is better off with Solid State or tube amps with lower output Z.
Here is a preview of the Mk2 crossover:
Look at the pane on the left for values. I cannot guarantee these will change but I am fairly comfortable with them. The most likely values to be tweaked are resistor values and C11.
Please note that this material is a preview of what is yet to appear on the website.
Here are my provisonal notes on tweeter selection.
The following were based on the Nomex version, but also applies to
Has flattest response, especially on axis, but suffers from poor
off axis response above 10KHz. Also lacks sensitivity in comparison
to the other three. While rated at 4 Ohm, in reality it is a 3 Ohm
Tweeter. The over-all impedance drops to below 4 Ohm above 5-6KHz.
This can cause the response to droop down from 2-3 KHz with high
impedance amps (some are up to 3 Ohm) Not a problem with power amps
that have low output impedance, such as solid state. Also push-pull
tube amps that use feedback to get output impedance well below 1
0hm. Price is reasonable but more than DX but less than HDS.
Not as flat response as XT but does NOT suffer from weak off axis
above 10KHz as much. It is also ABOUT 2dB more sensitive. It was
hoped to help keep the impedance higher than the XT. Approximately
the same 3 Ohm but added padding to bring down should help. But
in reality that did not work out. Price is lower than XT but it
has some advantages and disadvantages, I do over-all consider it
as good as XT. Take your choice.
Warning: More expensive, has least best response and similar
exaggerated HF as DX but better off axis response than XT. The
reponse suffers from a narrow lack of energy centred around 6KHz.
This can largely be fixed with a minor addition to the Diffraction
Wedge. Both XT and DX encorporate Ring Radiator in the outer
surrounds. The HDS surround is large than normal but no Ring
Radiator. This is the likely explanation for the 6KHz dip and
it is related to diffraction effects. But it can fixed by adding
two pieces of felt.
But advantages include arguably significantly lower distortion
than the other two AND it is rated 8 Ohm (again in reality 6 Ohm)
and sensitivity high, near that of DX. These two combined means
that impedance only drops to 6 Ohm. As a speaker system where
the impedance does not drop below 5.6 Ohm it can then be rated
as an 8 Ohm speaker system.
Another advatage is the electrical phase angle is even more benign
than the other two, making the speaker system even more easy to
drive. Finally, the voice coil is not driven as hard and the 'in
situ' temperatures will be a lot lower than the other two. But it
also contributes to the lower measured distortion AND less dynamic
RECOMMENDED FOR THOSE WITH HIGH OUTPUT IMPEDANCE AMPS,
LIKE MOST SINGLE-ENDED TUBE AND NO NEGATIVE FEEDBACK PUSH-PULL.
Here are the new Impedance and Electrical Phase plots:
As can be seen, the impedance stays well within the 12-6 Ohm envelope. The lowest phase angle is -10 degrees just above 2Khz where Z is 8 Ohm. As stated before, it's when a low phase angle coincides with low Z at the same frequency, this is where amplifier demands become unacceptable. What we have here is a benign load and good system efficiency and sensitivity above 90dB.
Well its taken care of! I phoned Solen and had them send out the newest Peerless HDS tweeter and component parts.
Are you still using the Horn with the new tweeter?
HDS Tweeter rules this roost!
Re 'horn' the answer is yes, and please keep the dimensions as shown. The acoustic centres of the top three drivers match with respect to 2.5M to 3M within millimetres, and the predicted response relies on getting the same dimensions and shape around the drivers.
Re the HDS tweeter I spent a number of hours yesterday measuring the distortion of the three tweeters I have tried in the Elsinores, the HDS, Vifa XT25 and Vifa DX25. I note that these three are also measured on Zaph Audio's website. I did THD, IMD and 2nd to 5th order graphs (similar to Zaph's, but using Clio rather than his SoundEasy). There is a reasonable correlation with Zaph's results and mine, and can confirm the HDS not only sounds lower distortion but also measures that way.
I will post graphs and numbers here asap. They will eventually be posted on the website as well but will appear here first.
Should be of interest to others whether they are considering building the Elsinore or not. The HDS deserves to be used by others IMO.
One thing I would appreciate feedback is C11, whether there is a preference between 3.9uF or 4.7uF. At the "factory" the former was considered more accurate but 4.7uF may be commercially better as it adds something to the presence region.
BTW, you are the 14th person I know of that either has built or are in the process of building the Elsinores. Thought you'd like to know. :)
My dad used to have a set of Koss speakers...they were built with peerless drivers. they discontinued the tweeter, but it was also used in Polk Audio speakers...it was the rectangular one, i can't remember the model #.
anyways, we built a 3 way speaker using that tweeter, a Peerless dome mid, and an 8" CSX Peerless woofer. they sound pretty good! we built those about 7 years ago so i wanted something different, and stumbled upon your website. my dad and i both fell in love! i'm building a set and if they are what we expect them to be, he's going to build a set as well.
i'm really excited about them. my concern at this point is the port seems somewhat small...will that make a big difference?
Keep up the enthusiasm...
This speaker goes very loud with 50W and using that as a basis for calculating vent mach should be about 0.16 at that power. But we did try a 300W amplifier and found no real world problem. Also, this is a rather sub-tuned vent with a peculiar effect. The Fb is 34-35Hz but the max output of the vent is below 30Hz. The whole alignment is rather like a sealed box but with the vent limiting sub 30Hz excursion. It's output is not maxed to the full. I have spoken to a couple of other designers about this affect and the port actually acts as a 'brake' on low frequency excursion. So far it is an observed effect and it needs looking at some more. But in the meantime there is no reason why not to use it.
I am not sure if you are familiar with/heard of the Duntech Crown Princess speakers (sealed). They have about the same foot print but way taller. Yet the rather smaller size Elsinore have way more bass extension and sheer bass power (and nowhere near as power hungry). BTW, Duntech is still a going concern here in Sydney and are working on new models for the US/Canadian market. I am on good terms with them.
Oops sorry i just realized i wasn't very clear with my post.
Solen sent me a small port tube...quite a bit smaller than the one in your design. i was just checking to see if that will make a difference in sound. the port tube is only 2"! Seems quite small to push that much air through it.
Thanks for all your help!
I too have not been able to find a ready-made port down here in Oz. There is a 100mm gap between the two vertical braces (rear panel) so that limits the size to that. Could use 3" or 80mm, but the length would need to be shorter to tune box to 35Hz and will also mean a significant increase in vent mac and possible noise.
I will post tweeter distortions of Peerless HDS, Vifa XT25 and DX25 either late today or tomorrow latest.
|All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.|
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio