|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#491 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm moving forward on this project, drivers are ordered, parts are ordered, and a friend that is an experienced builder is helping me on this.
One question - can the main brace (the "ladder" brace) use circular cut outs instead of square cut outs? |
|
|
|
#492 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Actually, same question for the cutouts on the front sub panel - can the cuts be circular instead of square?
|
|
|
|
#493 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
square cutouts using a jigsaw are far easier/quicker than routing circles out IMO.
|
|
|
|
#494 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#495 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Quote:
Quote:
As far as using holes in lieu of square/ rectangular cutouts in the main brace, I'll chicken out and leave that one to Joe to answer. |
||
|
|
|
#496 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Sorry, but have been a little out of the loop in the last few weeks. Been putting in long hours of amplifier work - the other hat that I also wear. Only $38 US is an amazing price. 1. Not everybody are able to recess the driver and according to some of DST's info on the driver it was designed to be both. What about the difference in time alignment? Yes, there is a difference and if the driver is sunk further into the baffle the focus point is a little further back but not really consequential. It has to do with the slow rise time of the midbass relative to the rise time of the tweeter which is very fast. This fuzzy time edge, to use a photographic analogy, makes the exact point less critical. This is quite different from normal Butterworth 1st order that has to be milimetre accurate, or so we are told. 2. I suppose the answer is yes, but felt is so ideal. Foam would be my other choice. The current design uses two layer each supposedly 6.35mm, but the felt I sourced is closer to 8-9mm despite what they say. So they must have allowed for some kind of compression or load - but that doesn't apply here. Can you use three layer? Evidently yes as other constructors have done so, but use common sense as you have to interpolate the dimensions of the rectangular cut-outs. 3. The port cut-out has to fit between the two rear panel vertical braces and the space available is 100mm. Can the outside dimension of the port you have in mind fit inside that? If you go for a larger diameter port, the port will need to be longer. The box tuning should end up around 33-34 Hertz and can be checked with basic tools, multimeter and oscillator, when the box is fully assembled. But 4 inch I don't think will be anywhere near long enough. On the subject of a suitable waveguide proper, this is definitely going to be looked at in the future. The idea would then be to get them made in quantity using a CNC machine, remove the felt, order in a pair of waveguides and simply substitute. The question will then be whether the crossover will nedd some tweaking to get the max out of it. If it does, then it may only need to have the value of C2 trimmed back, the value may be less; this will only become apparent in time. Mayby this will become Mark 4 - but a reasonably easy upgrade from Mark 3? Joe R.
__________________
The "Elsinore Project" DIY Speaker System Webmaster: Custom Analogue Audio, JLTi and... "The Linear Current Loudspeaker" |
|
|
|
|
#497 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Joe R.
__________________
The "Elsinore Project" DIY Speaker System Webmaster: Custom Analogue Audio, JLTi and... "The Linear Current Loudspeaker" |
|
|
|
|
#498 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#499 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Philadelphia
|
Darn!
Yes, it appears so Sorry Duc |
|
|
|
#500 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think round cutouts in the braces should be fine.
I'm thinking of building a pair of "Elsinores" - except - using these woofers as the upper two: http://www.parts-express.com/pe/show...number=299-126 I imagine the crossover change will not be too difficult, cabinet will have to be modified some, should be fun ![]() To really cut costs, I might try these tweeters instead of the HDS: http://www.parts-express.com/pe/show...number=279-450 Yes - I know it wouldn't be fair to call them Elsinores anymore at that point - but, who knows, might turn out well? |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Proac 2.5 clone" or "Elsinore project" | Joel Wesseling | Multi-Way | 10 | 26th May 2011 05:51 AM |
| A thread to post your "project files" | critofur | Multi-Way | 10 | 21st March 2008 12:50 PM |
| "compact loudspeaker factory visit from "magico mini" thread | Nanook | Multi-Way | 2 | 4th January 2008 07:30 AM |
| The "Really simple and cheap speaker designs for the newbie!" thread. | Spasticteapot | Multi-Way | 5 | 19th March 2006 04:16 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11895 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 10 queries |