|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern CA
|
I have a friend that has a pair of these that he will be using in a two way monitor system. He also heard that the 17W75LQ are not recommended to be driven wide open in a sealed box as to the 17W75 which they can be. They said the LQ’s are not recommended to be run under 70 Hz or with a capacitor to limit them. He heard that the LQ’s should be capped on the bottom frequencies or they will be bottoming out. Does anyone know the real load down on this situation that can share your knowledge?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Zagreb
|
Some of mentioned things are apparently true.
I have Dynaudio 1.3mk2, and they use the LQ driver, since it bottoms out very, very frequently. The same story is true for the smaller Audience 52SE, as described on some reviews, since they use the drivers after ceasing the production of 1.3's (ref. http://www.audioholics.com/productre...udio52sep2.php and http://forums.audioholics.com/forums...+audience+52se) Both speakers are bass reflex loaded and suffer from the same problem, although for the 1.3s I really don't know if there's problems only with some particular series, or the whole production have sam issue. The review mentioned above is the only one I can find describing the bottoming out. I'm also very interested about resolving/clarifying this question.
__________________
eddie |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern CA
|
To clarify this he was told that the 17W75LQ can not be used as a full range woofer, now does anyone know anything on this?
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern CA
|
Does anyone else have any knowledge of this or have any comment or advice to this situation on these woofers?
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
Quote:
edit>how is your 3 way woofer inductor design going?
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern CA
|
Quote:
Thanks for your input. I have put my project on hold for now and seeing how my friend is going to set his up. Since he picked up these drivers on the used market I like to see how the outcome is on them first. I figured that if he can get his setup right then I would use that same setup and incorporated my 30W100’s as the low frequency subs. Basically running a two way system and using four 17W75LQ & the Esotery as the two way the four 30W100’s as the subs in the same enclosure since the binding post are the 17W75LQ & Esotar is together and the 30W100’s are separate. That was one idea that was brought by someone which I thought that might work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
Hi
Sounds like your friend is onto something if he's bi-amping as well. Keep us informed regards,
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern CA
|
Infinia
No he's not bi-amping, he's just setting the 17W75LQ & the Esotar with the crosssover using these two drivers going as a two way system full range and running a single amp. For me, I have no option either but to setup my crossover correctly too as I can not afford two Krell's as one is already enough since they suck up so much power. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Californication
|
Hi
Use the Krell for the bottom and for top amp you need roughly about 6 dB less power. So if the Krell is 200W/4 ohms (2 woofers in // ) then look for a good 60-80W/4 ohm amp for the MTM. Once you Bi-amp you'll never look back, it really makes a difference.
__________________
like four million tons of hydrogen exploding on the sun like the whisper of the termites building castles in the dust |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern CA
|
Infina
I got the system dialed in now after playing with it the last few weeks. Like I said I was going to run the 17W75LQ down to full range. I'm not rolling them off on the low end at all. As I said these are woofers and I really don't I'm going to have a problem of bottoming out as I think the people that are bottoming them out is only using them as their only low frequency source. As I said I'm running two of the 17W75LQ's with also two 30W100's and the 17W75LQ is not my only source for my low end. So I can see why other people had trouble because they were probably over driving them. Pictured below is speaker and my system and if you would like to know more of what I'm running check out my introduction link: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...postid=1135712 |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS Dynaudio D-260 Esotec, pair as new $199 | qquickk | Swap Meet | 5 | 20th February 2012 10:59 PM |
| Dynaudio Esotec 17WLQ vs. 17W75LQ? | ro9397 | Multi-Way | 13 | 17th February 2012 09:47 PM |
| RS180 and Dynaudio Esotec D-260 | jaudio | Multi-Way | 3 | 11th July 2005 04:28 PM |
| Dynaudio 17WLQ esotec datascheet | maartentje | Multi-Way | 1 | 6th March 2005 01:08 AM |
| FS: 1pair Dynaudio 15w75 ESOTEC | kasra | Swap Meet | 2 | 26th October 2003 12:44 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11735 seconds (80.95% PHP - 19.05% MySQL) with 10 queries |