|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Simple question, what are the type of caps (brands ?) for high pass passive cross over ? Is there a difference in quality using one type of caps for low pass say for 100hz and when filtering at 8000 hz ? Whic would be most appropriate ?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
The opinions are varied on this one. Some say the caps are more important and some say the inductors are more important. Some don't care and will use electrolytics and iron core throughout.
I use electrolytics and iron core for bypass and when they're really big and I can't justify the cost of others. I use metallized polypropylene or polyester for most of the series stuff. Watch out, there are many opinions on this. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
|
Clarity Cap SA is a good value for money, open, non gritty sound. Welsh product. For low-mid you can use MKT bypassed by 1uf Clarity SA.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
I think Cal has it about right.
Big value coils and poly caps can be very expensive. Not sure if I agree on the use of electros for shunt, but I'm going to argue ;-) It also comes down to the drivers used. Expensive drivers MAYBE warrant more expensive components But.. generally, for use with use basic quality drivers, use a good quality poly where you can afford the size. Air coils where they aren't to big or expensive. For large caps , I like the Visaton SAF. I think I can maybe tell the difference over a regular electro. Big coils, use iron cores unless you will be really driving the speakers hard, then you may need to consider dumping the fund for air cores. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: huttenheim
|
__________________
Pierrick |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Passive crossover into active crossover | hahfran | Multi-Way | 16 | 10th February 2008 06:16 PM |
| Fonkens and 6W - advisable? | ianc13 | Full Range | 3 | 21st September 2007 05:27 PM |
| Is it possible or advisable to use a lake as a ground? | tom1356 | Everything Else | 19 | 9th August 2007 05:19 AM |
| Passive Crossover for Passive Subwoofer? | Toast_Master | Subwoofers | 23 | 30th April 2006 12:14 AM |
| Advisable PCB solutions for a DAC | Sandor | Digital Source | 16 | 5th October 2005 09:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08870 seconds (72.49% PHP - 27.51% MySQL) with 10 queries |