|
Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | diyAudio Store | Blogs | Gallery | Wiki | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oslo
|
![]()
Many crossovers in published designs use compensation networks to flatten overall network impedance: typical is a LCR network placed directly across the input terminals to flatten the (often) rising impedance at crossover point.
This is supposed to make a more friendly amplifier load. How important is this? Any opinions or experiences? EspenE |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
The only time it is important is when the output impedance of the amplifier, or the cable resistance is high. If so, a varying impedance will affect the frequency response.
The load itself is easier if the impedance peak is there, since the impedance is higher. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
I use low output impedance amps, so it's not an issue for me for that reason. However, Zobels and conjugate networks also help the crossover sections.
For a simplified example, a midrange speaker will have an inductor and a capacitor in series to set the upper and lower rolloffs. At low frequencies, the capacitor will increase in impedance, and the loss is the ratio of that impedance to the driver's impedance. But without a conjugate, there will be an impedance peak at the mid's low frequency resonance, and the loss from the input capacitor at that frequency will be much less than it should be. A similar issue occurs at the high end, especially for drivers with a strongly rising high frequency impedance from voice coil inductance. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oslo
|
Thanks for the answers.
Yes, I'm aware of the use of zobel/conjugate network inside crossovers. What I'm after, is the use of compensation network "ouside" the actual crossover. Consider the impedance curve attached: a network without impedance compensation with a broad impedance peak of 25 ohm at about 2500 Hz. The same network with a LCR network of 10 ohm / 33 uF / 0,12 mH directly across the input gives flat impedance 5-8 ohm throughout. On paper, the compensated network of course looks the best. But does it matter in practice? Only when amplifier output impedance is high? How "high"? Tube-amplifier-high? Thanks, Espen |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
o. With low amplifier output impedance, (high damping factor) and low cable resistance, I certainly agree that there would not be an effect.
If the amp and cable have a combined resistance of 1 ohm, a 5 ohm load will have about a 0.8 dB loss, and essentially zero into the 25 ohm load, resulting in about a 0.8 dB error. I'd consider that a second order effect, but if the speaker has a peak in that region you might not want the addition. I hope I'm more helpful this time ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
R.I.P.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
The strange thing that people use these to make the speaker " valve friendly ". IMO anything but. Valve amplifiers love high impedance. What needs to be done is balancing the speakers response with a significant source resistance - this is the genuine "valve friendly" speaker. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Active Crossovers & Baffle Step Compensation | Mikett | Multi-Way | 21 | 8th June 2014 10:40 AM |
Impedance compensation | DR ANALOGUE | Multi-Way | 1 | 7th May 2006 04:51 PM |
Impedance Compensation in Active Systems | ShinOBIWAN | Multi-Way | 11 | 13th February 2006 10:39 AM |
Impedance compensation | Polimorph | Multi-Way | 1 | 6th June 2004 03:33 PM |
Impedance compensation calculations based on T/S params? | Jim85IROC | Multi-Way | 0 | 5th February 2004 08:42 PM |
New To Site? | Need Help? |