|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
7th January 2007, 03:21 PM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Separate chambers
Hello.
IŽd like to ask about the need of a separate chamber for the mid driver in a three way design (TW, Audax 3" and Peerless 8"). What would be the negative effects of avoiding that chamber? The question comes from this article in Zaphaudio. http://www.zaphaudio.com/commonenclosuretest.html Thanks. Pablo. |
|
|
7th January 2007, 03:36 PM
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
|
Bad idea with a midrange as they have very little excursion capability and the woofer would cause it to move too much.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| using blast chambers for finishing metal? | cowanrg | Everything Else | 1 | 30th November 2004 03:03 PM |
| "tubes" instead of chambers? | audiotang | Multi-Way | 9 | 28th July 2004 08:07 PM |
| Two woofers--two chambers | Mos Fetish | Multi-Way | 3 | 10th December 2003 06:12 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
