In order to eliminate Cms-based distortion, should Cms be...

454Casull · 31st December 2006, 03:25 AM

constant (flat line vs excursion) or purely parabolic (vertex at 0mm)?

noah katz · 1st January 2007, 02:05 AM

Cms and its inverse the spring stiffness should be constant.

31st December 2006, 03:25 AM	#1
454Casull diyAudio Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada	In order to eliminate Cms-based distortion, should Cms be... constant (flat line vs excursion) or purely parabolic (vertex at 0mm)?

1st January 2007, 02:05 AM	#2
noah katz diyAudio Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Mountain View, CA	Cms and its inverse the spring stiffness should be constant. __________________ ----------------------------------------- Noah

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
new idea? to eliminate need for BSC	pforeman	Full Range	26	14th June 2009 10:33 PM
Eliminate POP on power off	groover1234	Car Audio	21	3rd December 2007 05:06 AM
2nd Order Distortion Circuit	lineup	Solid State	15	2nd January 2006 08:44 AM
Freeware Program To Eliminate Hum From Wav Files?	kelticwizard	Everything Else	4	3rd April 2003 03:22 AM
What is worst - even or odd order of distortion	DarkOne	Solid State	18	8th February 2002 12:42 PM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)