|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NSW
|
I own a speaker kit based on PHL 2440 drivers in MTM with Ravens R2. PHL are somewhat coy about response curves and I don't have the equipment to do my own testing. I've managed to source some curves taken using an "IEC60268-5 standard flat baffle" and I'm wondering if anyone here can give me some idea as to the dimensions of this test baffle.
p |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
IEC standard baffle: 135 cm wide, 165 cm high with driver center offset 15 cm to one side and 22.5 cm towards the top from the baffle center.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NSW
|
thanks Ron,
that's BIG and in this case [and probably most others], very different from the speaker box the drivers will finally come to rest in. The offsets are presumably designed to smooth baffle step but may I ask ... is this particular standard designed to show up certain features of a driver for further analysis/correction or is it just a convention? p |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Not sure of the origin of the standard, but it gives about +/- 1dB compared to infinite baffle above ~500Hz and +/- 2 down to 100Hz.
I would guess that it is somewhat arbitrary, but chosen for the qualities above and practical reasons like moving it and setting it up, etc and mainly as a standard point of comparison. See: http://www.visteon.com/utils/whitepa...04_01_1694.pdf
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NSW
|
thanks for the info. and the pdf. reference. That's helpful
p |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using a standard pentode-tetrode as output "space-charge tube" any ideas-experiences? | bembel | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 11th March 2010 05:56 AM |
| need list of "standard" values such as impedance | keantoken | Everything Else | 3 | 30th August 2006 04:40 AM |
| cheap 6" or 8" woofer to make great bass for a standard cab pick up | zuki | Subwoofers | 12 | 15th February 2005 07:54 AM |
| A "Standard Noise Source" for SPL meters. | Jonathan Bright | Everything Else | 6 | 13th July 2004 10:19 PM |
| "Standard" EIC power input vs. Filtered EIC | Eric | Everything Else | 16 | 18th May 2001 09:31 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08694 seconds (69.73% PHP - 30.27% MySQL) with 10 queries |