|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I found this interesting site:
Ground Sound Especially the digital filter (DCN23) seems very interesting. Have anybody tried it? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
I wonder if that new DCN26DAV Xover is still under construction....
__________________
Is that all there is? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Helsingor
|
Hello all.
We are still developing a new crossover, but things have changed a bit/byte. The working title of the crossover is DCN28DAV, which indicates 2 input channels, 8 output channels, digital in and analogue in and volume control. I think we are nearly there, but we still have some issues.In the meantime you can read a review of our Chassis 1500 in the next issue of Hobby HiFi from Germany and a review of our power amplifier module PA3CC in Elektuur/Elektor September issue.
__________________
GroundSound.com Active Sound - Active Listening Digital Crossovers, Power Amplifiers and DIY modules |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
Sounds already great
__________________
Is that all there is? |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Leeds, UK
|
Quote:
Will it have single ended analogue inputs? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Helsingor
|
Quote:
The digital inputs options will be 2 S/PDIF and 1 balanced AES. We might make a possibility of optional optical TOS link. The outputs (only analogue) will be "pseudo” balanced.
__________________
GroundSound.com Active Sound - Active Listening Digital Crossovers, Power Amplifiers and DIY modules |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
|
What type of crossover does this product use? Is it a digital implementation of a Linkwitz-Riley crossover, like the Behringer or the dbx, or is it a FIR design, like the DEQX or Juice HiFi?
If my question contains any errors, please correct them. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
It is almost freely configurable with a GUI running on your PC.
One of the great advantages of digital x-overs is the possibility to achieve transient-perfect crossovers. A nice topology to achieve that would be the subtractive-delay type (After Lipshitz & Vanderkooy, nice spreadsheet by John K available). Robert: When are you going to implement this topology ? Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Helsingor
|
The processor will be capable of doing both IIR and FIR. I’m not sure how the configuration will be as FIR filters calculations demands roughly 20 times more that IIR does of processing power. If FIR is used one will have to settle for less eq points etc. I would say that one has to focus on the weakest point in the system and I hope everyone can agree that it’s the drivers/loudspeakers. Focusing at the speakers will dictate measurements of the system and not to forget the room too. The software we provide for the DCN23 and the new crossover is supporting measurements import, which we find crucial for the system performance. We don’t consider using only FIR filter as the best solution. A blend of IIR and FIR will give some advantages.
The subtractive delay type filter presented in an AES paper from 1981 is a bit obsolete theory from my point of view. It focuses on the filter response and function, which doesn’t make much sense when considering that ex. tweeter and bass doesn’t have the same impulse response and also mounting will influence on the result. It is beautiful is theory, but lack performance in the real world. In the 1980ies I actually implemented a system with the subtractive delay type filter design, but it did not outperform a “normal” filter design at all – of course it was analogue. I will still claim that the key to a good system performance will be to focus on optimization of the speakers from good measurements. Sorry - I just had to ad some smilies
__________________
GroundSound.com Active Sound - Active Listening Digital Crossovers, Power Amplifiers and DIY modules |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Active notch filters | neutron7 | Full Range | 2 | 19th November 2006 11:51 AM |
| preamp active filters | DD_Davo | Solid State | 29 | 7th April 2006 01:23 AM |
| FS: Capacitors/ Opamps/ Power Transistors/Noise Filters & Other Interesting Stuff | dtm1962 | Swap Meet | 1 | 8th February 2006 04:21 PM |
| active filters: which resistors to buy | akunec | Chip Amps | 11 | 13th March 2005 01:09 PM |
| where to place active filters? | AndrewT | Multi-Way | 1 | 22nd October 2004 12:14 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11259 seconds (80.66% PHP - 19.34% MySQL) with 10 queries |