|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
|
Hi,
After having read the Design Models and FAQ pages on Linkwitz's site and a couple of threads on this forum, I'm still unsure about the effective distance between the front and rear wave in an OB speaker. According to Linkwitz the frequency at which the output of an OB speaker equals the output of a closed box with the same driver can be calclauted as Fequal = 0.17 v / D D is the effective distance between the front and rear wave, right? In case of a circular baffle with the driver in the center, does D equal the radius of the baffle (half the width of a rectangular baffle) or the diameter (total width of a rect baffle)? Maybe I missed something, but here Linkwitz takes the total width ('diameter') of the Phoenix as D, while here half the baffle width ('radius') is used... Could someone help me with this question? Erwin |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
D is the extra distance the rear wave must travel, so on a flat circular baffle D is the radius. For example, I've played around a little with 15" drivers with no baffle at all, so the driver itself is the baffle. D=7.5" and Fequal predicted at 306hz. 15's don't display the 6db peak above Fequal because Linkwitz's stuff assumes a center point of origin, but a 15 launches it's wave from a wide range of surface to edge distance, so the response was surprisingly smooth. It just starts rolling off at 6db/oct at about 300hz. Smaller drivers don't fair as well with circular baffles.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
Erwin,
It can get a bit confusing, but the first case you noted is for the Phoenix woofer which is more complicated than a simple flat baffle. SL explains it much better on this page..IMHO: http://www.linkwitzlab.com/models.htm#B Cheers, Davey. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Effective mass?? | dario54 | Analogue Source | 6 | 6th August 2008 07:40 PM |
| effective mass | IZHAKKATZ | Analogue Source | 6 | 6th August 2007 08:48 AM |
| What's the effective delay ? | Will | Multi-Way | 8 | 26th March 2006 06:45 AM |
| diysubwoofers.org - effective diameter from Sd | Dave Jones | Multi-Way | 4 | 31st May 2004 12:21 PM |
| effective mass | peterr | Analogue Source | 9 | 5th April 2002 02:52 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06549 seconds (79.30% PHP - 20.70% MySQL) with 10 queries |