|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
Saturation will make a steel core inductor in a crossover less good than an air coil.
But when happens the saturation? Is this only at high currents? So then a steel core inductor gives alway good sounds at low volume levels. When saturation is only dependend of the current then we can use an air coil in series with woofer because the current is highest. So there is no need to use air coils in notch filters and low current tweeter filters? At what power or current will saturation be audible? And what is the effect on sound? Harmonic distortion only at high volume levels? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
If the core saturates, the inductor will loose the inductance. Compare a toroid transformer under startup conditions.
You should pick a core which can handle the current you'll have in mind. The other more obvious side effect is maybe unlinearity and hysteresis. You choose iron core (of some kind) when you want high inductance and rather low resistance.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Use air core if you can accept the higher cost or resistance. It will have less distortion.
Use cored if you have to have low resistance. Larger cores will handle more current before saturation. Cores for inductors usually have large air-gaps, like rod cores and such. The will saturate gradually, gradually increasing distortion. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
Thanks for the aswers.
But at what power or current has saturation effect? Is the distortion bad? Many people use tube amplifiers to create some kind of distortion. When saturation creates second and third harmonic distortion it will be good? Tube amps create also distortion and sound more natural.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
Quote:
Quote:
My point is that the distortion is not consistent. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: home sweet home
|
Quote:
sorry, could not resist.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belgium
|
Does anybody know what the difference in sound is between air and non air inductors.
What is the effect on woofer, tweeter or in case of notch filters? |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
|
Oh-oh!!!!
Quote:
In home audio I would ascribe the subjective superiority (to some including me) of tube amps to the several benefits they could have; the higher harmonic distortion being a backdraw and NOT the reason for their good performance (besides, measured distortion patterns of tube and transistor amps do not necessarily differ much). Some benefits of a minimalistic set amp versus a typical commercial transistorised amp (push-pull) that come to mind: - minimum component count in signal path - much better phase behaviour due to the absence of negative feedback - no crossover region distortion - ?????? ...which mainly translates into better midrange. Needless to say there are many backdraws much greater than the slightly higher harmonic distortion that go with sets. To answer your original question The way I understand it is that the 'distortion' you'll get with a saturated X-over coil is simply that the crossover won't work as planned but e.g. in the case of a first order low-pass filter the woofer crossover point will shift upwards = subjectively more midrange + break-up resonances will come through with more bite (especially in the case of alu-cone // kevlar etc. woofers). Iron-cored coils are only used because they are cheap, small and have low DCR for a given price. Groets -- Simon |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
There isn't any until the iron core saturates. With good iron core or ferrite this will not hapen until the speaker is so stressed you wouldn't notice anyway. Buy cored inductors when they are more than 1mH, it only makes sense. Cored inductors have lower DCR, better "Q".
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Copper coil inductor vs. round core inductor | tomchaoda | Pass Labs | 7 | 21st September 2011 04:42 AM |
| Unwinding a steel laminate core inductor? Formula? | AudioLapDance | Parts | 1 | 18th February 2009 01:27 AM |
| inductor/choke/air core/ferrite core. . . same thing? | poolorpond | Pass Labs | 24 | 29th March 2008 10:55 PM |
| air core inductor vs. iron core inductor | WBS | Planars & Exotics | 5 | 7th May 2007 11:02 PM |
| AIR-Core Vs Ferrite-Core Inductor in Class-D amplifiers | Workhorse | Solid State | 13 | 23rd January 2004 09:14 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11392 seconds (79.90% PHP - 20.10% MySQL) with 10 queries |