|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
|
Is anyone aware of an equation for calculating the internal box pressure in a ported enclosure? This seems pretty straight forward for a sealed enclosure, but much more complicated for a ported enclosure. I've googled and searched here, and I have not found anything. Thanks!
-Robert |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I don't know if the equation for internal pressure is calculated, but the Thiele-Small closed and vented box articles are here:
http://www.readresearch.co.uk/HTML/articles.htm
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
|
I know of no such equation, but it should be close to what the pressure is in sealed box that's outputting the same dB at the same freq.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Noah |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
The sound pressure level (SPL) inside the box is
20*log10( (4*r*pi*c˛)/(w˛*V) ) ...decibels higher than the SPL at the distance r, if the speaker is placed in free space, and the box dimensions are much smaller than the wavelength. c=345 m/s, V=box volume, w=2*pi*f, f=frequency. The baffle step is neglected. In fact this is the basis for a rather clever method of determining the anechoic response of subwoofers; put the microphone inside the box, tilt the response by 12 dB/oct (due to the quadratic relation to the frequency) and voilá: there is the response outside the box. No need for expensive anechoic chambers, and no more measurements in the back yard. Note: doing the math usually results in a 40-60 dB boost at low frequencies, in other words if the system plays at 100 dB at 1 metre, the leven inside the box is 140-160 dB. This seems unreasonably loud, but is true for many systems. This in turn leads to that measuring the response with the mic inside the box very easily leads to overloading of the microphone, which may seem very counterintuitive since the sound outside the box is not very loud. The equation is identical for both closed boxes and bass-reflex. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ported Enclosure Advice | JakeDN | Subwoofers | 36 | 22nd April 2008 09:24 PM |
| Ported enclosure question | MrPerfectionest | Car Audio | 5 | 31st October 2006 04:08 PM |
| ported --> vented enclosure? Or just sealed? | dj.eph | Subwoofers | 3 | 20th December 2004 05:23 PM |
| building a slot ported enclosure | bassman80hz | Multi-Way | 3 | 26th February 2003 06:59 AM |
| Tempest Ported Enclosure | SsZERO | Subwoofers | 12 | 11th March 2002 06:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08001 seconds (75.86% PHP - 24.14% MySQL) with 10 queries |