|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
So.....generically speaking, when the wavelength produced by the speaker is the size of the cabinet, it reflects off the cabinet, giving you approx. 6 dB more SPL....that I understand.
For the longest time I could not understand why it is a "loss" of bass and not a gain in "midrange/treble". I think I know why, please confirm. When a speaker is rated at say 87 dB, that is as measured on a large baffle, which means with the +6 db baffle step. So when that 87 dB speaker is used on a narrow cabinet (narrower then the test baffle), you get a ~6 dB loss in SPL, correct????
__________________
Audio DIY Page FOLLOWMY529.COM - Subscribe and follow the performance of my daughter's 529 College Saving Account. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
|
It is in fact a gain in midrange and treble, but since everyone uses speakers mounted on some kind of baffle or another (the driver itself acts as a baffle to frequencies that ‘small’ relative to it), it is taken into account in the efficiency rating, yes. So relatively speaking you get a bass drop.
Also, baffle step is not generally considered to be when the wavelength is bigger or smaller than the baffle, but usually done by the half wavelength. So if the half wavelength is bigger than the baffle you get the drop in bass. At least I hope that is right |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Placentia, CA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Placentia, CA, USA
|
Tenson,
Try it again before posting. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
This is just a semantic problem. There are two ways of looking at it.
1. If the driver is thought of as playing in full space at low frequencies, there will be a gain of 6 dB at high frequencies compared to the level at low frequencies due to the baffle step. 2. If the driver first is mounted in an infinitely large baffle, there will be a 6 dB gain over the entire frequency range. If the baffle then is narrowed to the size of an ordinary loudspeaker, there is a loss of 6 dB at low frequencies. Once both points are understood, it becomes unimportant which explanation model you choose, since they are equivalent (sort of).
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Yes you are correct. Drivers are measured with pi loading. Boxes have 2pi loading in the bass, going up to pi in the midrange. So compared to measured pi response, boxes are -6dB in the bass. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Hey Tenson,
Good to see another Opera Browser user on the forum! Link is working now.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kent
|
I'm afraid the page still doesn't work for me, but never mind.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? | 454Casull | Multi-Way | 15 | 19th May 2012 03:12 PM |
| Baffle Step Compensation | Khron | Multi-Way | 4 | 16th April 2006 08:23 PM |
| baffle Step | rgrayton | Full Range | 33 | 4th December 2004 11:16 PM |
| Baffle Step + Sub | Aural Dan | Multi-Way | 7 | 9th October 2004 08:23 PM |
| baffle step help. | AudioGeek | Multi-Way | 3 | 10th February 2004 11:02 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11435 seconds (72.51% PHP - 27.49% MySQL) with 11 queries |